To: tbird5
(Her case had also undergone repeated court review.) We've seen that 'court review' is often a misnomer, and more often than not a crossing of legal t's and dotting of bureaucratic i's than a consideration of meaningful fact.
3 posted on
02/01/2006 4:23:47 PM PST by
atomicpossum
(Replies must follow approved guidelines or you will be kill-filed without appeal.)
To: atomicpossum
If the State had been better at review, she wouldn't have remained to BE beaten.
Letting her die permits her attacker to be tried for murder. I say try the State workers for murder. They failed her.
4 posted on
02/01/2006 4:29:26 PM PST by
weegee
(Happy Holidays! Tis the season of MLK, Chinese New Year, Tet, Valentine's, Presidents...)
To: atomicpossum
a consideration of meaningful fact
Technically, there is only one finding of fact, at the trial court level. All of those wonderful appellate reviews are merely matters of law.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson