To: RWR8189
" Aravosis from AmericaBlog told E&P: "Now that the Joint Chiefs have addressed the insidious threat cartoons pose to our troops, perhaps they can move on to less pressing issues like getting them their damn body armor.""
What an a-hole.
7 posted on
02/01/2006 3:42:20 PM PST by
adam_az
(It's the border, stupid!)
To: adam_az
"Aravosis from AmericaBlog told E&P: "Now that the Joint Chiefs have addressed the insidious threat cartoons pose to our troops, perhaps they can move on to less pressing issues like getting them their damn body armor."
What an a-hole.
Of course, Clinton wanted body armor for every soldier. And made sure that our soldiers had the armored vehicles they asked for in Somalia.
And where's Saddam, er I mean Where's Bin Laden?
144 posted on
02/01/2006 10:10:02 PM PST by
kenavi
("Remember, your fathers sacrificed themselves without need of a messianic complex." Ariel Sharon)
To: adam_az
Part of the reason we have survivors with such grievous wounds is that they have body armor. They are surviving explosions and other assaults that they might not have survived in previous conflicts.
Body armor has limited effectiveness for extremities.
Besides being a left-wing weenie, Aravosis is also uninformed. Of course, that never stops the Dems from offering opinions, does it?
153 posted on
02/02/2006 3:01:50 AM PST by
opocno
(France, the other dead meat)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson