1 posted on
02/01/2006 1:09:25 PM PST by
pillut48
To: pillut48
Freepin' has pushed it into a 2% lead as of 1611 EST [Yes 51% ; No 49% ]
2 posted on
02/01/2006 1:10:58 PM PST by
ExcursionGuy84
("Jesus, Your Love takes my breath away.")
To: pillut48
Yes, such behavior is not allowed in that setting and is inappropriate. 51%
No, she was a legitimately invited guest and deserves to have her right to free speech honored. 49%
3 posted on
02/01/2006 1:11:33 PM PST by
apackof2
(You can stand me up at the gates of hell, I'll stand my ground and I won’t back down)
To: pillut48
It showed my vote, you'll have to click on "Capitol Police"
(in red) to go back to the original page to vote.
4 posted on
02/01/2006 1:11:41 PM PST by
pillut48
(CJ in TX)
To: pillut48
From Drudge:
FLASHBACK: Man Wearing Anti-Clinton T-Shirt Removed from Senate Gallery at Impeachment Trial Wed Feb 01 2006 08:47:08 ET Cindy Sheehan, the anti-war activist who was removed from the House gallery last night before the State of the Union address for wearing a t-shirt with a political message, is not the first person to be tossed from a Congressional gallery at a high-profile event for wearing a political t-shirt. In the early days of the Senate's impeachment trial of President Bill Clinton in January 1999, a Pennsylvania man named Dave Delp was removed by the Capitol police from the Senate gallery for wearing a t-shirt that said, "Clinton doesn't inhale, he sucks." The Pennsylvania school teacher was yanked out of a VIP Senate gallery and briefly detained during the impeachment trial for wearing a T-shirt with graphic language dissing President Clinton. Delp, 42, of Carlisle, Pa., and a friend had just settled into their seats when four Capitol security guards approached them. Delp said at the time that he was ordered to button his coat and follow the guards. Outside the chamber, he was told "several people felt threatened by your shirt." Even after establishing that Delp was a guest of Sen. Rick Santorum (R-Pa.), the guards wouldn't let him back in and escorted him to a basement security area, where they questioned and photographed him. After being given one of the photos as a souvenir, Delp said he was banned from the Capitol for the rest of the day. "They were polite and professional," Delp added, "but they really did scare me. I think I should have been given the chance to cover up." Sheharm wasn't the first.
5 posted on
02/01/2006 1:14:47 PM PST by
Ben Mugged
("Television is the most perfect democracy, You sit there with your remote control and vote")
To: pillut48
I notice that she was fading, the media wasn't covering her much, and she couldn't draw a crowd at her book signing or in Europe.
Chavez helped her regain publicity. This poor, homely creature thrives that publicity so she is happy. Chavez is a nut, so he is happy. I wonder about the Democrats. I wonder how thrilled they are with this nut being their face.
I suspect many of them want her to go away.
To: pillut48
This sure smacks as being planned. It just sounds so planned.
7 posted on
02/01/2006 1:15:45 PM PST by
freekitty
To: pillut48
because she was wearing a T-shirt with an antiwar slogan
According to the news I was watching she was "detained" because she was carrying a protest flag of some kind that she planned on unfurling. Protest is illegal inside the chambers. And yes I agree with it.
To: pillut48
To: pillut48
Is "Should have been shot on sight" an option in the poll?
12 posted on
02/01/2006 1:21:05 PM PST by
clintonh8r
(If you don't support the mission you don't support the troops. Period.)
To: pillut48
Do you agree with the decision by Capitol Police to remove activist Cindy Sheehan from the gallery at the president's State of the Union speech because she was wearing a T-shirt with an antiwar slogan?
* 207773 responses
Yes, such behavior is not allowed in that setting and is inappropriate.
51%
No, she was a legitimately invited guest and deserves to have her right to free speech honored.
49%
13 posted on
02/01/2006 1:24:02 PM PST by
weegee
(Happy Holidays! Tis the season of MLK, Chinese New Year, Tet, Valentine's, Presidents...)
To: pillut48
It's still showing 51% supporting removing Sheehan vs. 49% opposed, after I voted.
I heard earlier this morning that the Senate Rules forbid signs, including signage on tee-shirst, things worn, unfurled, etc. and that Sheehan was aware of the Senate Rules and disregarded them.
How many hundreds of thousands have attended functions and previous SofU Addresses in the past in the Senate and never violated these rules...and Sheehan didn't EXPECT to be removed for violating them? This is just vaudeville on her part AND her peers, whoever they may be.
I'm surprised that she was even provided access (Senate ticket for that purpose). She certainly is TRYING to get arrested and booted and shown the door. I'm glad We The People could oblige her this time.
To: pillut48
Could you notify MS-NBS that you would like to see them expose the same tactic of "Daily Chaos" that they exposed of FR? See elsewhere in this thread to see their earlier "issue" with FReeping.
Or at least post their response.
Thanks
20 posted on
02/01/2006 1:34:15 PM PST by
weegee
(Happy Holidays! Tis the season of MLK, Chinese New Year, Tet, Valentine's, Presidents...)
To: pillut48
Poll doesn't work. Someone who hasn't done it try cutting and pasting the link, since they may be denying the vote to referrals from FR.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson