Which of my thoughts do you want me to post? I don't mean that flippantly; when a skeptical viewpoint on the global warming/climate change issue is posted (which is what you did, unless you wrote the WSJ opinion) I feel it is necessary to provide the current "mainstream" scientific understanding of the issue. My "thoughts", minimal as they may be, tend to credit the knowledge of the majority of scientific community on the global warming/climate change issue as accurate. Therefore, I am of the opinion that what I posted is a reasonably accurate scientific representation of this issue, and is relevant to a balanced consideration of it.
My thoughts as a scientifically-literate layman are less relevant than those of the experts, I would think.
"I...tend to credit the knowledge of the majority of scientific community on the global warming/climate change issue as accurate."
Yeah, the majority of the scientific community is never wrong... Yeah RIGHT! Then I guess the world is flat after all! I suppose if an 'expert' told you to jump off a cliff, you wouldn't question it and just jump? Well this scientific consensus you believe in is telling you to jump off the cliff - have at it. I'll take the trail down to the shore myself.