Posted on 02/01/2006 10:45:07 AM PST by GeneD
NASHVILLE, Tennessee (Reuters) - President George W. Bush vowed on Wednesday the United States will rise to Israel's defense if needed against Iran and denounced Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad for "menacing talk" against Israel.
In a Reuters interview aboard Air Force One en route to Nashville, Bush also said he saw a "very good chance" that the governing board of the International Atomic Energy Agency will refer Iran to the U.N. Security Council for possible sanctions.
"I am concerned about a person that, one, tries to rewrite the history of the Holocaust, and two, has made it clear that his intentions are to destroy Israel," Bush said.
"Israel is a solid ally of the United States, we will rise to Israel's defense if need be. So this kind of menacing talk is disturbing. It's not only disturbing to the United States, it's disturbing for other countries in the world as well," he added.
Asked if he meant the United States would rise to Israel's defense militarily, Bush said: "You bet, we'll defend Israel."
Ahmadinejad has prompted international condemnation for anti-Israel rhetoric in recent weeks, including saying it should be wiped off the map, and also calling into question the Holocaust.
Iran is engaged in a stand-off over its nuclear program. Tehran insists its program is aimed at developing nuclear power and the United States and other international powers charge it is seeking to develop nuclear weapons.
Asked if he thought the IAEA will refer Iran to the Security Council, Bush said: "The IAEA must take a look at the facts, and listen carefully to the arguments, and there's a very good chance it will."
The council's five permanent members, including a reluctant Russia and China, this week agreed to ask the U.N. nuclear watchdog to report Iran to New York immediately.
Bush also said he had spoken to Russian President Vladimir Putin about Iran and would not say how Putin feels about a Security Council referral. "He understands the threat, and we share the same goal," he said.
The IAEA's governing board will decide at an emergency meeting in Vienna on Thursday whether to report Iran to the Security Council.
Here's where we really need that NEUTRON bomb that Jimmy Carter didn't like; kills people, doesn't break stuff or make it glow in the dark.
ping for standing with your best ME ally.
My wife said "he just threatened Iran". Yes, he did.
Hi, VaG. What do loserdopians have to do with the USS Liberty or Pat Buchanan for that matter?
Dear Mr President:
Thousands of Israeli men, women and toddlers were not murdered in recent years directly by Iran.
They were murdered by the allies, friends and colleagues of a man you honored and praised in the White House.
You were the first sitting President to call for the birth of a terrorist state at Israel's throat. A terrorist state that will now be ruled by Islamic fanatics identical to and allied with Al Quida and Iran.
Cheap talk about Iran, Mr President. Reminds we of Bill Clinton's vow to man an Israeli foxhole.
Sincerely,
Bush also said he saw a "very good chance" that the governing board of the International Atomic Energy Agency will refer Iran to the U.N. Security Council for possible sanctions.Of course, the French have already said there won't be any sanctions...
<< Won't need to. Israel can handle Iran. >>
Spot on.
Israel would defend America against Iran!
I think GWB has been making the mullahs a little bit uncomfortable, since he and Condi have taken over the steering wheel from the euroweenies.
It's refreshing to have total White House clarity on some issues.
It was an obvious typo.
Still the Bush does no wrong crowd is quick with the vitriol against anyone who sees the man and his flaws without blinders.
"Isreal would defend America against Iran"
Would they? I mean really? Do you think they would? Could they? is a better question I think. I think that any war agianst Isreal is a war against the U.S., but a war against the U.S. isn't neccesarily a war against Isreal...just IMHO
"It's hard to defend a country that has been wiped off the map in a nuke strike."
No kidding. It may be "avenge" instead of "defend" if this situation continues to develop the way it is now.
Wanna lookie here?
OTOH the Palestinians do not represent an existential threat to Israel tragic and serious as the terror was. The solution was well within Israel's hands and borders to control. And in fact Israel ended Intifada 2 when they struck back beginning with Operation Defensive Shield after the Passover Massacre.
American policy under Pres Bush reflected the desires of most Israelis including its leadership. Like it or not the reality is that PM Sharon called for separation and a Palestinian State. You can't be more Catholic than the Pope.
My own gut feeling is that PM Sharon and others sought to get the Palestinians out of the way before the more serious issue of Iran comes to the fore. That moment is rapidly approaching.
Now that Hamas has been elected many say it is a reflection of the mistake of disengagement. Wrong. It is a reflection that Arafat died and the stranglehold on Palestinians was relaxed. The election of Hamas provides some advantages to Israel chiefly that Hamas is tied to the global Jihad movement which means that the world, not just Israel, may be interested in their curtailment. In terms of parochial interests, terror and seeking the destruction of Israel, Fatah and Hamas are indistinguishable. The Europeans and leftists of all nationalities and stripes, including Israelis, were able to convince themselves in the face of obvious contradictory evidence that Fatah was interested in coexistence. The same will occur with Hamas at a lightening speed pace.
I would only expect European attitudes to change if they make the global connection. Hamas is part of the Muslim Brotherhood. The Brotherhood is the seed group for Al Qaeda, Zawahiri's starting point.
Daniel Pipes has an excellent article on the Hamas election:
http://www.nysun.com/pf.php?id=26722
"Palestine is the wrong name for their State. It should be called Anarchy."FReeper sgtbono2002
"Then let's wait and see what the Arabs do after they take Gaza. There's nothing like Arab reality to break up a Jewish fantasy."FReeper Noachian
A student told his professor he was going to "Palestine" to "fight for freedom, peace and justice,"Orwellian leftist code words that mean "murder Jews."
The Nature Of Bruce ~
And what of teh vitriol of teh Bush can do nothing right crowd?
They will always find SOMETHING to whine about so they can be as unhappy as they are determined to be.
Israel is more than capable of taking care of herself.
The only real question is preemption. Preemption when and preemption how. Tactical attacks will solve nothing. Unfortunate as it is, the only way to preempt Iran would be the use of tactical nukes since tactical conventional attacks would never preempt Iran's desire or ability to "wipe Israel off the map". Nukes used in anger are at their greatest threat since the 1973 Arab-Israeli war when Israel had the ability to destroy the surrounded Egyptian Army and the Soviets threatened nuclear attack.
Iran's size, the distance from Israel and the large number of dispersed assets make it impossible for Israel to attack Iran--conventionally--and put an end to Iran's threats.
Nuclear threats could well be answered by nuclear preemption.
Sharon was responding to the Saudi Plan and the "Road Map".
Even as wrong as Sharon was, which recent events have just begun to prove, his plan was contingent on a Bush promise to recognize certain Israeli positions including vis a vis the "West Bank". Promises now disavowed by the Administration.
If you don't believe Hamas to the East and West and Hazballah to the North, is an existential threat to Israel- especially when Islamics make inroads in Jordan and Egypt- wait and see.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.