To: nmh
"What was there to LIE about?"
A prosecution expert claimed she was sane and merely imitating a law and order episode, which, in truth, had not aired at the time of the killings.
(The L&O episode was based on the killings, not the other way around, I think.)
41 posted on
02/01/2006 9:54:44 AM PST by
MeanWestTexan
(Many at FR would respond to Christ "Darn right, I'll cast the first stone!")
To: MeanWestTexan
I don't think the prosecution claimed she was imitating the attacks, only that she used the insanity excuse because of that episode.
45 posted on
02/01/2006 9:56:46 AM PST by
nickcarraway
(I'm Only Alive, Because a Judge Hasn't Ruled I Should Die...)
To: MeanWestTexan
"A prosecution expert claimed she was sane and merely imitating a law and order episode, which, in truth, had not aired at the time of the killings. "
Now, that's INSANE!
Obviously the witness was wrong. Besides this case was clear cut on its own. They didn't need a witness to prop it up. It screams for capital punishment.
62 posted on
02/01/2006 10:25:33 AM PST by
nmh
(Intelligent people believe in Intelligent Design (God))
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson