"Sovsem zabyla - v fil'me 'Terror v Moskve est' kadry, na kotorykh vidno, kak moyu Sahsu vynosyat iz teatra. Ehto v posledney chasti - snachala viden chelovek so shpritsem v rukakh, a potom spetsnazovets neset na rukakh devochu v svitere i blyukakh (sviter zapominayushchiysya - u net svet menyaetsya ot bledno-sirenevogo sverkhu do temno-sirenevogo vnizu). U devochki obe uki svobodno boltayutsya s odnoy storony. Ehto Sasha.Which translates to:
"A fil'm est' i u menya, i u Lyuby. Ya znakoma i s Denom Ridom (on i prodyusser ehtogo fil'ma, i rezhisser, i stsenarist tozhe), i s dvumya drugimi prodyusserami."
"I entirely forgot - in the film the 'Terror in Moscow' there are some frames in which you can see them carrying my Sasha from the theater. This in the last part - a man with a syringe in his hands is at first visible, and then a special forces soldier carries in his arms a girl in sweater and trousers (the sweater changes color from the pale-lilac on top to dark-lilac below). Both the girl's hands dangle freely to one side. This is Sasha.
"I have the film, and so does Lyuba. I know Dan Reed (he's the producer of this film, and the director, and the scenarist as well) and two other producers. "
Thanks for the translation.
I’ll see if I can find that documentary and watch it again. I know how uncomfortable it was for me to watch it the first time, and I didn’t have first hand experience of it. It leaves you with a dark eerie feeling.
I think it’s obvious the government, after a certain amount of time, decided they were not going to negotiate with the terrorists. They wanted to send a message to future terrorists. The innocents were considered collaterol damage.
And being a Freeper, I sort of understand why they would want to send that message.
My biggest problem is the gas they used. From what I’ve read it was extremely experimental. But I also think the government was going to be second guessed no matter what they did.