Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: angkor
The [covert] bar is much higher than what you state above, both for the technical application of "covert status" and the manner in which the statute can be violated.

I know that. But I think you misconstrued my statment. Anybody seen walking into CIA HQ can't be "covert." "Covert" implies that, among other elements, to an "outside" observer, the person has no relationship with the CIA whatsoever.

Some additional elements include foreign location for the covert duty, and having been in that position withing the past 5 years.

But this isn't a leak case.

46 posted on 02/01/2006 12:15:13 PM PST by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]


To: Cboldt
But this isn't a leak case.

True. When all is finally said and done you will be amazed a what kind of case it actually is.

Let's say it involves something 'yellow'.

53 posted on 02/01/2006 12:46:31 PM PST by UCANSEE2 (Low-swooping Hawk)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson