We;ll have to agree to disagree. I think Libby will be able to show that he was in thousands of discussions over this period of time with officials and reporters and most concerned far more weighty matters than this, and that to charge him with deliberately lying about such a nothingburger is preposterous. Especially so since there was nothing secret about the matters in these discussions and no national security stuff involved. And then add the bias and foreknowledge of the he said/he said reporters on the other end of the conversation---Pheh. Stupid case.
I didn't speculate on the outcome. I laid out what I think represents the gist of the case; that being Libby's failure to disclose to investigators his personal inquiry to the CIA, the failure to disclose (to investigators) that during the timeframe in question, he knew Plame's status as a matter of fact.
Do you disagree with that characterization of the case? If so, have you read the indictment?