Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: plain talk; Ichneumon; andysandmikesmom
see post #57

Okay, I did.

In post #57, you said:

Whether you saw it or not is irrelevant. I have responded at least once to a Creationist for exactly the same thing.

Bully for you.

However, I can't help but notice that when you're given an opportunity to actually do it on this thread (not just refer obliquely to having done it "at least once" in the past), you have declined to do so.

Yet you complain about Ichneumon's posts. You continue to use the word "spam." You have called the posts "Data packed as spam to shout down an opponent".

Interesting that you should throw insults like "spammer" when confronted with lengthy posts on one side of the issue, but not on the other. It does tend to indicate that your real beef is with the point of view itself, not how Ichneumon expresses it.

336 posted on 02/02/2006 3:00:25 PM PST by highball ("I never should have switched from scotch to martinis." -- the last words of Humphrey Bogart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 335 | View Replies ]


To: highball

I have been consistent. As I said I have responded at least once to a Creationist for exactly the same thing. Nice try.


341 posted on 02/02/2006 5:25:33 PM PST by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 336 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson