[microgood]

Ich is a spamster and does not serve his cause well.

He does the spam posts when he gets mad. The madder he is, the bigger the post. If he is really mad, then the internet goes down.

If one knows their beliefs are sound they have nothing to fear from looking at evo sites. I have studied them and find them extremely one-sided and shallow.

One difference I have noted about scientific evo sites (not including talkorigins.org which is a completely biased and non-scientific propaganda site), is that they never talk like anything is controversal and all is settled. On the other hand, I have been to 3 or 4 big bang theory sites and they all have from 5 to 10 items at the bottom that describe the problems associated with the big-bang theory.

If the evos would admit to/show the problems with evolution their sites would appear more scientific.

[narby]

On the other hand, I have been to 3 or 4 big bang theory sites and they all have from 5 to 10 items at the bottom that describe the problems associated with the big-bang theory.

That's because there are considerable problems with big-bang. It was originally proposed by a religious astronomer as a way to explain how God created the universe. Science adopted it after Hubble's red shift data, but no doubt some scientists were religiously motivated back then, and now it's contradictions are catching up.

I never really bought into it, although I don't know enough about it to argue the subject.

Evolution on the other hand is obvious on it's face, and is supported in many cross correlating manners. So why should evolutionists "admit to/show the problems" where there aren't any?

[Lurking Libertarian]

If the evos would admit to/show the problems with evolution their sites would appear more scientific.

Which "problems" do you have in mind?

[plain talk]

If the evos would admit to/show the problems with evolution their sites would appear more scientific

They can't because they are lame partisans just like the democrats. There is no difference between the way many evo's post on these thread than partisan democrats. Condescending snide little comments etc. But who cares about them? I'm more worried about our children being schooled in an environment hostile to intellectual analysis and questioning about theories.