Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: connectthedots
Jones decision in the dover case is not binding for any parties other than the ones directly involved in that case.

That is true, as I have said more than once.

Jones' opinion has absolutely no relevance to any future case; even within the same district.

That is most definitely not true. The witness testimony exists. Those same witnesses (Behe, etc.) can't contradict themselves in other trials. The facts that were brought out won't go away. The fraudulent nature of that idiotic Pandas book is there for all the world to see. Any new ID case will see the same material all over again. That's why there probably won't be any more ID cases.

103 posted on 02/01/2006 2:33:01 PM PST by PatrickHenry (Virtual Ignore for trolls, lunatics, dotards, scolds, & incurable ignoramuses.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies ]


To: PatrickHenry; Right Wing Professor

The 'district' I was referring to is the US district court, not the 'school district'.


105 posted on 02/01/2006 2:45:23 PM PST by connectthedots
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson