Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: CheyennePress
Photographing objectors is objectionable? How so?

People (that includes objectors) have the Right to go about their business without government interference or monitoring, so long as they're not breaking the law. How would you have felt if, during the Clinton years, police had routinely photographed people attending conservative churches?

47 posted on 02/01/2006 7:08:24 AM PST by Grut
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]


To: Grut
How would you have felt if, during the Clinton years, police had routinely photographed people attending conservative churches?

First, there is a difference between participating in a public protest on a public street or park, and going into a church for a service.

I don't recall anyone taking my photo as I entered a church, but I do recall having cameras trained on me as I participated in RKBA events in public places. I never felt the need to go slug the photographer, no matter who he was. Some were Maryland LEOs, but I had no expectation of privacy while out on a public street or park.

53 posted on 02/01/2006 7:30:59 AM PST by tgslTakoma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]

To: Grut

The purpose of a protest demonstration is to be noticed. And to get your picture taken and hopefully shown on the local and/or national news.


54 posted on 02/01/2006 7:58:00 AM PST by pepperdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson