Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RobbyS

I think he larded up what might have been a more interesting story with a lot of heavy-handed propagandizing. Even so, I doubt the original story from the novelist, which I have not read, had the makings of a great movie. More to the point, I don't think the subject would have mass appeal.


391 posted on 02/03/2006 9:07:01 AM PST by WashingtonSource (Freedom is not free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 277 | View Replies ]


To: WashingtonSource
To reiterate what we all know, the point is to advance the homosexual agenda by creating sympathy with "victims" of what the call homophobia. This film lacks the bathos of "Philadelphia" but it is still sentimental. One of the characters is a monster, what Gene Shallit called a sexual predator ever bit as unbalanced as Glen Close's character in Fatal Attraction. In refusing to make this character a villain, Lee ends up with a tale that is at its heart false.
397 posted on 02/03/2006 4:09:55 PM PST by RobbyS ( CHIRHO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 391 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson