Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New Sonofusion Experiment Produces Results Without External Neutron Source
RPI ^ | 27 Jan 2006 | Jason Gorss

Posted on 01/31/2006 10:41:43 PM PST by Tyche

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

1 posted on 01/31/2006 10:41:46 PM PST by Tyche
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Tyche

bttt


2 posted on 01/31/2006 10:44:57 PM PST by FOG724 (Governor Spendanator)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tyche
Wake me up when it works.
3 posted on 01/31/2006 10:46:41 PM PST by benjaminjjones
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tyche
By bombarding a special mixture of acetone and benzene with oscillating sound waves, the researchers caused bubbles in the mixture to expand and then violently collapse. This technique, which has been dubbed “sonofusion,” produces a shock wave that has the potential to fuse nuclei together, according to the team.
Sonofusion. Yeahright. Someone telephone the neologism police. Scientists should stick to science. Destroying our beloved mother tongue should be left to the experts: Television and Texans.
4 posted on 01/31/2006 10:55:13 PM PST by Asclepius (protectionists would outsource our dignity and prosperity in return for illusory job security)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Asclepius

This would make more sense:

"By bombarding a special mixture of acetone and benzene with oscillating sound waves, the researchers caused bubbles in the mixture to expand and then violently collapse. This technique, which has been dubbed “Hip-Hop,” produces a shock wave that has the potential to fuse nuclei together, according to the team."

There. Thats better


5 posted on 01/31/2006 10:57:54 PM PST by Tyche (It is easier to take life than to give it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Tyche

Maybe Frank Hebert was on to something? DUNE!


6 posted on 01/31/2006 11:03:12 PM PST by aliquando (A Scout is T, L, H, F, C, K, O, C, T, B, C, and R.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tyche

File this away under the heading, "Cold Fusion May Be Sound Theory".


7 posted on 01/31/2006 11:05:23 PM PST by coconutt2000 (NO MORE PEACE FOR OIL!!! DOWN WITH TYRANTS, TERRORISTS, AND TIMIDCRATS!!!! (3-T's For World Peace))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tyche

Impossible! Fusion power will never work.

Of course, that's what they said about the airplane, air brakes, the steamboat, space travel, the light bulb, the laser, a Republican congress, democracy, etc. etc.

I can see the headlines now:

"Exxon lays off 10,000; stock delisted."

"Oil falls below $20 per barrel."

"Energy companies fail as cheap fusion power gluts market."

"Last coal mine closes in West Virginia; no work for miners."

"Environmentalists question long-term entropy effect of fustion power; may accelerate proton decay."

"Greenpeace warns of impending heat death of universe; fusion power the culprit- 'We may only have a billion years left' says Nader."


8 posted on 01/31/2006 11:07:54 PM PST by Ostlandr ( Hey! Where'd my tagline go?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ostlandr

Excellent<:o))


9 posted on 01/31/2006 11:11:33 PM PST by Turborules (Liberal Ideas today as always are a Oxymoron)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Asclepius
Destroying our beloved mother tongue should be left to the experts: Television and Texans.

Ya'll be right bout dat.

Oops, that was Carville Cajun.

10 posted on 01/31/2006 11:56:09 PM PST by Mind-numbed Robot (Not all that needs to be done needs to be done by the government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Ostlandr

What about "World awash in surplus neutrons"?


11 posted on 01/31/2006 11:59:13 PM PST by Mind-numbed Robot (Not all that needs to be done needs to be done by the government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Comment #12 Removed by Moderator

To: Tyche
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1566686/posts
13 posted on 02/01/2006 3:38:27 AM PST by snowsislander
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Asclepius
"Sonofusion. Yeahright. Someone telephone the neologism police. Scientists should stick to science. Destroying our beloved mother tongue should be left to the experts: Television and Texans."

So what descriptive term do YOU suggest to replace it???

14 posted on 02/01/2006 3:51:55 AM PST by Wonder Warthog (The Hog of Steel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Wonder Warthog
So what descriptive term do YOU suggest to replace it???

Would you object if we called it....

"Wonder Warthogtivity" ??

15 posted on 02/01/2006 6:04:29 AM PST by Drammach (In the kingdom of the blind, the one-eyed man is king..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Drammach
"Would you object if we called it...."Wonder Warthogtivity" ??"

Actually, yes. Scientific/tech terms are supposed to be descriptive of the process. Since "sonoluminescence" is already an accepted term, I'm happy with "sonofusion".

16 posted on 02/01/2006 6:53:08 AM PST by Wonder Warthog (The Hog of Steel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Drammach; Wonder Warthog
Actually, yes. Scientific/tech terms are supposed to be descriptive of the process. Since "sonoluminescence" is already an accepted term, I'm happy with "sonofusion".
My (counter)question would be this: what about the other kind of "fusion"? Why isn't it called "nuetro-fusion" or something like that? How is this fusion different than the other fusion?--answer: only because of the perturbing force or cause. Why is combustion in gasoline engines not called "sparkcombustion" as opposed to "compressioncombustion" for diesel engines?

So by your reasoning should not every instance of fusion, however caused, get its own moniker too?--and would we not be multiplying terms beyond necessity when what we're talking about in every instance is still fusion?

Wonder warthoggin', I think, would be a more defensible term. It has a better ring to it.
17 posted on 02/01/2006 8:44:18 AM PST by Asclepius (protectionists would outsource our dignity and prosperity in return for illusory job security)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Asclepius
"Why isn't it called "nuetro-fusion" or something like that? How is this fusion different than the other fusion?"

For the simple reason that for many decades, it was the "only" type of fusion even considered as possible. Then there was "cold" fusion to distinguish it from "hot" fusion. And now there is "sonofusion" to distinguish it from either of those.

Semantics aside, this is really exciting news.

18 posted on 02/01/2006 12:36:35 PM PST by Wonder Warthog (The Hog of Steel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Tyche

Don't tell Iran.


19 posted on 02/01/2006 12:37:41 PM PST by hershey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tyche

Bookmarked for when someone explains it to me.



20 posted on 02/01/2006 12:39:31 PM PST by Fintan (One day we'll look back on this and plow into a parked car.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson