[Rider on the Rain]

Are you kidding or are you that ignorant that you don't know females aren't allowed in combat units?

Actually, US DoD regulations notwithstanding, I think it's a valid question. I couldn't help but admire the fact that LBJ sent both his sons-in-law to Viet Nam.

For the record, I am a conservative republican.

[phoenix0468]

I didn't ask if you were a conservative republican. And you have further exposed your ignorance with your follow up post. So what if LBJ decided to "send his son-in-laws to Vietnam." Are you questioning the Presidents patriotism because his daughters have not chosen to join the military? It is their choice, not their father's. Does this simple fact not register with you?

[phoenix0468]

BTW, why are you using an entirely different handle to respond to my earlier post? That is most times a trolling method and questions your integrity in the "conservative" area.

Please see post #3.

I smell troll meat here.

[TheCrusader]

"For the record, I am a conservative republican."

You might be a Republican, but forget the 'conservative' part. "Conservative" means, among other things, maintaining traditional American values. Sending girls off to war to protect the men back home isn't a traditional American value; it's an ass-backwards, new-age feminist phenomena.

[Conservative til I die]

Actually, US DoD regulations notwithstanding, I think it's a valid question. I couldn't help but admire the fact that LBJ sent both his sons-in-law to Viet Nam

Please explain how President Bush can force his adult children into the Armed Forces.