I gave you the truth free of charge. If you have a problem with it, then address it rationally, not as you have with illogical rubbish.
The problem is the logical rubbish that passes as science. Grant money has created a wasteland in what should be scientific method, and far too often peer review is simply preaching to the group-think choir.
My experience with the science departments at Universities is that they are full of personal politics that affect the judgment of the staff, and the scientific findings (when open to interpretation or variable input) amazingly correspond with the click they're in.