Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: papertyger

I was asking Vicomte the question because of this remark:

"for devout practicing Catholics, there actually IS truth in the charge: devout, practicing Catholics are not free agents."

This implies to me that the Vatican's position on ANYthing would have to take precedence, which is why I was asking to have that clarified!


78 posted on 01/31/2006 2:28:43 PM PST by linda_22003
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies ]


To: linda_22003
"for devout practicing Catholics, there actually IS truth in the charge: devout, practicing Catholics are not free agents."

This implies to me that the Vatican's position on ANYthing would have to take precedence, which is why I was asking to have that clarified!

Ostensibly, an officer of the court is not a free agent either, so why would you see the first sentence, hyperbole aside, as implying the second?

86 posted on 01/31/2006 2:40:06 PM PST by papertyger (We have done the impossible, and that makes us mighty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson