Aside from any specialized definitions of the terms used I'd say my understanding of those statements is fairly positive.
Mind you, my assent is qualified by my own ignorance of what appears to be a formula of which I am not familiar.
Understood. In light of that, could it be possible that Natural Law is only one leg of a 3-legged stool that holds a (moral) society together? We know that (immoral) societies do not last, correct?