[SirLinksalot]

Why a trial? Trials are not tools for discovering truth. THey're for determining guilt beyond a shadow of doubt

Thats the problem with this Italian court. This judge officiously deemed himself capable of deciding on his own, evidence regarding history.

A good judge would simply throw the case out of court and say --- THIS COURT DOES NOT MAKE DECISIONS REGARDING CASES LIKE THESE. DON'T WASTE MY TIME.

Unfortunately, we have too many judges here and abroad who think they know enough about everything to decide for everyone else.

[barj]

Judges!?! Sheesh! Politicians, heck people. Try doing something with your property without going before a community review Name an area of life that gov doesn't micro manage. They know everything (sarc).

[samtheman]

A good judge would simply throw the case out of court and say --- THIS COURT DOES NOT MAKE DECISIONS REGARDING CASES LIKE THESE. DON'T WASTE MY TIME.

You are absolutely right.

[ApplegateRanch]

This judge officiously deemed himself capable of deciding on his own, evidence regarding history.

No, he did not.

The judge threw it out years ago, and after a long, drawn out appeals process, he was ORDERED to reinstate and hear the case.