But it would be pretty useless if they did not arise at the same time. They would have died out in one generation so the mutation would have been lost.
But it would be pretty useless if they did not arise at the same time. They would have died out in one generation so the mutation would have been lost.
Metmom, you just lost a lot of respect. Your point is superficially obviously true, but Ichneumon addressed it, and explained clearly in terms that a layman can understand why it is false, in the very post that your responded to. I expect more than mindless anti-evolution sloganeering from you. That comment from you lumps you in with the hicks who were hiding when God handed "reading comprehension" around.
Go back and read Ichneumon's post again, this time for comprehension. In fact if you genuinely want to understand why biologists overwhelmingly accept evolution read all of Ichneumon's science posts in this thread and on his profile page. Very carefully. Take as long as it needs, or you are selling your own faith short. If you cannot be bothered to do that, then how is your disbelief in evolution really any more considered than the YEC ignorami?
You have, right here in this thread, an expert who will answer pretty much any question that you care to pose about ToE, and who is willing and capable of teaching you. He'll be very polite and helpful if you don't ask stupid questions that he has already addressed (extremely rude on your part) How many people ever get that opportunity? But you pass all of that up with a sniffy ignorant canard, because you'd rather not learn. Sad, sad, sad.