[Right Wing Professor]

I happen to be a creationist (surprise, surprise!). I also believe in the Bible. The original Hebrew that was used for the word "day" in Genesis indicates a normal, 24-hour day. Given this, and the evidence I see around me, and the evidence others present, I reject the TOE.

Then you unequivocally reject much of modern science. Given that, why should we take seriously any scientific arguments you might make?

I may be wrong in some of the arguments I present. For all I know it is possible for the very beginning asexually-reproducing creatures to produce a sexually-reproducing creature. I wouldn't bet on it, though.

But then, you reject the ordinary, demonstrable-in-a-laboratory processes of radioactive decay. Why would we argue something as complex as sexual reprodcution with you, when you don't accept well defined, well understood, basic physics?

[ShadowAce]

Then you unequivocally reject much of modern science.

No, I don't. I may interpret it differently than you do, though.

But then, you reject the ordinary, demonstrable-in-a-laboratory processes of radioactive decay.

See above.