All the time. Creationists like mlc make claims that appear to be dishonest, and when called on it they smirkingly ask you to research their point for them. They often claim victory if you point out that it is their job to justify their claims. A poster in another thread has just claimed that "thousands of scientists reject evolution", and when called up to back up his claim he doesn't appear to feel any shame at being unable to justify it. Just like mlc. Utter shamelessness when caught fabricating or repeating the easily demonstrated falsehoods of others appears to be the hallmark of most creationists.
I gather that there is a middle-eastern religion that thinks ill of those who lie. Many of these people should consider joining it, but their behaviour would have to improve greatly.
You have really, really hurt my feelings now. You are just another mean atheist.
Also take note, in her post #1135, mlc9852, cannot but help spread another one of her little white lies, that "You and the rest of the atheists are winning so what's the point?"...these are her exact words taken from her own post..tho she has been told, time and time again, on just about every evo/crevo thread that exists, that in real life, as on FR, most people who support evolution, also consider themselves as people of faith, mostly the Christian faith...why is it that mlc9852, absolutely refuses to take another posters word for that?...is it because she cannot accept that others believe the Bible in a way contrary to her own beliefs?...who knows...
But one thing is for sure, she will continue to insist that all who support evolution, just have to be atheists...this, in my mind, allows her to have her beliefs on a steady ground...she must try to discredit anyone she can who disagrees with her, and she does it on lies....very,very dishonest, for one who claims to believe in the Bible...
The last time mlc9852 tried to discuss this matter with me, she just called me rude, and ran off...and why was I rude...because every time I asked her a question, she replied with a different question...I told her what I thought of that method of discussion....that answering my questions with other questions was not a way to have a worthy discussion...for that I was called rude...I hardly call it rude, when discussing with someone, when you ask a question to expect an answer...that is not rude...that is purely common sense and logical...
And so she called me rude, and ran off....
I find it interesting to discuss evolution, ID, and creationism, and see others differing views...its just all very interesting to me...but discussion is almost impossible if one if going to answer questions, with only more questions, and make up lies about other posters...good, honest debate, with claims supported by facts, are enlightening for everyone...
For the last final time, mlc9852, your opinion that all who support evolution have to be atheists, is just that...your opinion...its not a fact, as is witnessed in real life, and on FR....most who support evolution, do believe in the very same Bible, you claim to believe in...our interpretations may differ tho...calling one an atheist because their Biblical interpretation is different from yours, is something I would not think of as being a 'Christian' thing to do...yet you continue to do it...sad...
There are different creationist/ID supporters, who do hold interesting discussions and conversations with those who support evolution...and those discussion are worthwhile...
Yes, mlc9852, now I suppose you will call me rude again...so be it...your definitions of rude, are made up to suit your personal agenda at the time...if my asking questions, and expecting answers in return, is rude(according to your own subjective definition of the word 'rude'), then yes, I am rude...I will openly admit it...