[Anthem]

BTW, I've worked with engineers for years. I understand moments of enertia and torque. Believe me, I was a loud skeptic of conspiracy theories myself, as most of what I saw was tissue paper. Other than the too convenient attack (as in qui bono, three other things have aroused my suspicions: My own knowledge of construction and demolition (I actually witnessed the Husky stadium collapse at the U o Washington years ago); Jones' work; and the really lousy job the 911 Commission did explaining it. The latter looks more like a coverup.

[okie01]

You realize that, for every Steven Jones, there are twenty other reputable physicists and engineers who conclude otherwise.

There are people who argue that the Rosenbergs were innocent. They have plausible sounding arguments. But, then, there is the jury's verdict...and the historians...who disagree.

The point being: there is "beyond a doubt" and there is "beyond a reasonable doubt".

The 9/11 committee made a hash of many things. But we don't have to rely on their judgment to make our own.