Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Flaws were numerous in this dubious election
Kansas City Star ^ | 1/27/06 | Lewis Diuguid

Posted on 01/30/2006 9:42:20 AM PST by Huntress

Edited on 01/30/2006 9:47:15 AM PST by Admin Moderator. [history]

They call it justice.

But there was no justification for how Jon R. Gray was prevented from becoming the first African-American presiding judge of the Jackson County Circuit Court.

The Kansas City branch of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People justifiably voiced its concerns about the way Gray was kept from moving to the top seat on the court. In a prepared statement, the NAACP wrote, “We are extremely concerned about this abrupt and unannounced change in the selection process as Judge Gray is the most qualified to serve as the next presiding judge.”

Presiding judges usually are picked in an informal manner that yields one nominee. Gray is second in tenure on the court behind Judge Edith Messina, who has served as Jackson County’s first woman presiding judge. Gray was appointed in 1986 and re-elected in 1988, 1994 and 2000.

Yet Gray’s tenure, including family court service, carried no weight. The NAACP charged that the normal practice “changed to selection by a secret ballot, which has not been done in many years.”

Gray was nominated with Judge Peggy Stevens McGraw. In a closed ballot, the judges voted 16-10 for McGraw. Her two-year term as presiding judge starts Jan. 1, 2007.

Current Presiding Circuit Judge J.D. Williamson said in a prepared statement that the selection process in December followed the procedures established by law. He disputed the NAACP’s charges and said tenure plays only a small role in who’s picked.

McGraw was appointed associate circuit judge in 1995 and circuit judge in 2001.

But this is what’s troubling: The action by the court is an example of the justice that African-Americans too often get on both sides of the bench. The presiding judge decision raises serious questions about the system’s fairness.

The court action gives the appearance of the rules conveniently changing when it looked like the only African-American circuit judge would preside. Such occurrences always look like racism’s markers.

Too often when people of color learn the rules and play by them to advance, the rules change, leaving minorities locked out. It is a classic American story of disparate treatment because of skin color. It is as wrong today as it has ever been.

The court action is particularly onerous after the Kansas City Metropolitan Bar Association justifiably celebrated the 50th anniversary of its integration. In 1955 the all-white organization admitted African-Americans Harold L. Holliday Sr., Lewis Clymer and Carl R. Johnson, who had been elected Kansas City’s first black municipal court judge.

Clymer eventually became the first black judge on the Jackson County Circuit Court. But legal backsliding seems to rule now.

A University of Dayton law school professor in an annual report found that the University of Missouri-Kansas City and the University of Missouri-Columbia in 2005 were among the whitest law schools in the nation. That’s a retreat from 2004.

It’s not good because the schools help provide lawyers for this area’s legal system. The lack of inclusiveness makes the justice system look suspiciously tilted against African-Americans.

Gray should be presiding judge. His community work and actions to extend the justice system beyond the courts are unparalleled.

I’ve watched him speak to inmates at the Moberly Correctional Center and the Crossroads Correctional Center in Cameron. Gray always listens to the men — even those he had sentenced to prison. He maintains an open mind and treats the men as human beings.

Gray addresses them with respect and leaves them feeling good about themselves, their future and judges. I know of the help he has given to struggling law students and how he played a key role in bringing an exhibit here on black lawyers. Gray continues to help make the courts fair and just where neither are assured — especially for African-Americans.

That’s why racial and ethnic diversity at all levels of law enforcement and the criminal justice system is so critically important. That’s also why the Jackson County Circuit Court’s judgment was flawed in bypassing Gray.

The bad decision needs to be overturned. If only there were an appeals process to make it so.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: diuguid
I practice in the Jackson County Circuit Court and I don't think racism had anything to do with Judge Gray not being elected presiding judge. Judge Gray is a good man, but he is a bad administrator and notorious for not following through on things. Mr. Diuguid would never believe that, though.
1 posted on 01/30/2006 9:42:23 AM PST by Huntress
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Huntress

Sorry for the bad formatting.


2 posted on 01/30/2006 9:42:57 AM PST by Huntress (Possession really is nine tenths of the law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mercat

Ping!


3 posted on 01/30/2006 9:44:56 AM PST by Huntress (Possession really is nine tenths of the law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Huntress

I fixed your article.


4 posted on 01/30/2006 9:47:44 AM PST by Admin Moderator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Huntress
What bad formatting?

: )

5 posted on 01/30/2006 9:49:19 AM PST by Publius6961
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Huntress

The fact that the NAACP complained about a change from the 'more customary informal' selection process to a secret ballot is telling. The latter is inherently more democratic.

Another example of how the Left prefers the Correct outcome to governnance that is reflective of popular will. This is especially true when it comes to jurisprudence.


6 posted on 01/30/2006 9:53:19 AM PST by walford (http://the-big-pic.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Huntress

I believe you, and I don't doubt for a second when you say Judge Gray is a good man. However, anyone living in the Kansas City area who has read Lewis Diuguid's columns knows the man sees a racist conspiracy under every rock, and behind every blade of grass. Quite frankly reading his columns really boring after reading them for one week. One knows exactly what to expect.


7 posted on 01/30/2006 9:53:53 AM PST by GarySpFc (De Oppresso Liber)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Huntress
Diuguid

Is that pronounced "do-good"? :D

8 posted on 01/30/2006 10:02:22 AM PST by hellinahandcart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Huntress

Affirmative Action OR ELSE.. <<- NAACP..


9 posted on 01/30/2006 10:06:16 AM PST by hosepipe (CAUTION: This propaganda is laced with hyperbole..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Huntress

Lewis Diuguid is a low-rent version of Bob Herbert. He sees a racist conspiracy in the fact that thunderstorm clouds are black while the cumulus clouds you see on nice days are white.


10 posted on 01/30/2006 10:10:58 AM PST by CFC__VRWC ("Anytime a liberal squeals in outrage, an angel gets its wings!" - gidget7)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GarySpFc
Then we are just talking opinion, and not established fact, when we discuss anything that Lewis Diuguid's columns include.

Nobody "deserves" a position based on skin tone alone. Even Martin Luther King Jr. asserted that view. And the position appears to be more honorary and reflective of abilities as recognized by peers, than anything that should be subject to 'affirmative action'.

11 posted on 01/30/2006 10:23:03 AM PST by alloysteel (There is no substitute for success. None. Nobody remembers who was in second place.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: alloysteel
Nobody "deserves" a position based on skin tone alone. Even Martin Luther King Jr. asserted that view...

MLK would be seen as a reactionary today.
12 posted on 01/30/2006 10:25:41 AM PST by walford (http://the-big-pic.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Huntress

Louis Duigood is infamous for finding a conspiracy behind every tree...anything that happens to anybody black is because of racism.


13 posted on 01/30/2006 10:54:04 AM PST by yldstrk (My heros have always been cowboys-Reagan and Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Huntress

So the author believes that if the judges actually vote for the person they believe is most qualified to be the presiding judge, it's "racist"? That reminds me of something I read on a satire site once, in which Jesse Jackson complained that "Who Wants to Be a Millionaire?" was unfair to blacks because it rewarded knowledge instead of awarding prices at random.


14 posted on 01/30/2006 3:31:14 PM PST by AuH2ORepublican (http://auh2orepublican.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Admin Moderator

Thank you.


15 posted on 01/31/2006 8:02:39 AM PST by Huntress (Possession really is nine tenths of the law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson