Being wrong isn't a lie or scientists would really be in trouble. Think back over the years, even t what you were taught in school science class. Has nothing changed since then? Were your teachers liars?
The name-calling just shows how little people on here really know. Otherwise, facts would fight facts and the name-callers would be run off as they should be.
Don't get too bogged down in assuming because science says something is true today that it will still be true tomorrow.
ID, like creation, is always wrong about the existence of arguments against its position. That's why every thread looks the same, because we have to remind the "dummies" of all the same stuff we reminded them of on the previous fifty threads where they showed up dumb as a stump with the same arguments.
I never see an ID-er anticipate the argument that evolution can originate structures which appear irreducibly complex. Never. They always show up chanting the mantra that this is a thing evolution cannot do. Someone else always has to show that simple scenarios involving deletion and scaffolding effects will get you there. Then the dummy demands eyewitness accounts, or some other evasion. Etc. Repeat indefinitely.
This is not stupidity. This is dishonesty, practiced by stupid people.