To: orionblamblam
<<<<
If the parents who care about their childrens educations have their way this will never be discussed in a science classroom"
There. That's better.
<<<<<
SIMPLE SOLUTION. LETS HAVE A SCHOOL VOTE INSTEAD OF A COURT CASE. NOT ONLY IN DOVER, BUT KANSAS AND ELSEWHERE.
IF THE CASE EVER GETS PRESENTED TO THE COURTS, A GOOD JUDGE WOULD SAY --- GO BACK TO THE BALLOT BOX WHERE IT BELONGS. THIS COURT DOES NOT INTERFERE WITH SCHOOL CURRICULUMS.
To: SirLinksalot
Here's a simpler solution: how about reserving science class for the teaching of *science?*
I know, it's a revolutionary thought.
24 posted on
01/30/2006 10:38:28 AM PST by
orionblamblam
(A furore Normannorum libra nos, Domine)
To: SirLinksalot; orionblamblam
As I posted when the Dover case was decided, I think it would be better to sue the school board in state court on fraud charges, and impeach and convict in the state legislature.
Consider Afrocentrism. This is another form of affirmative action, but unlike ID/creationism, there is no First Amend. problem.
But it's still fraudulent, and has no place in school.
IMO, not teaching history (or biology) at all is preferable to lying about it.
Impeachment and conviction are also appropriate, because school board members who engage in such conduct are also guilty of the high crime of mal (or is it mis-) feasance.
Conviction of impeachment carries the penalty of never being allowed on the gov't payroll again.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson