Skip to comments.
America's Energy Policy: Obstruct Supply, Marvel at Price
HUMAN EVENTS ^
| Jan 30, 2006
| Mac Johnson
Posted on 01/30/2006 9:07:06 AM PST by neverdem
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-44 next last
1
posted on
01/30/2006 9:07:08 AM PST
by
neverdem
To: neverdem
Our policy is clear and has been unchanged for thirty years or more: produce little, use lots, and wonder why things never get better.
He's right and it's a shame because the GOP is just as guilty as the Dims.
2
posted on
01/30/2006 9:09:49 AM PST
by
oh8eleven
(RVN '67-'68)
To: neverdem
3
posted on
01/30/2006 9:13:37 AM PST
by
A message
To: neverdem
Energy, it seems, is icky. The left's position in a 'nut'shell! They don't even want windmills spoiling their local vistas!
4
posted on
01/30/2006 9:15:25 AM PST
by
Rummyfan
To: oh8eleven
Spot on.
Neither side of the aisle has the backbone to make the correct decision - to become ENERGY INDEPENDENT BY ALL POSSIBLE MEANS.
5
posted on
01/30/2006 9:15:40 AM PST
by
roaddog727
(P=3/8 A. or, P=plenty...............)
To: neverdem
Great Post!
Great Article!
President should borrow some for tomorrow night!
To: neverdem
Wow, that is positively Steynian writing! Great piece!
7
posted on
01/30/2006 9:19:28 AM PST
by
NonValueAdded
(What ever happened to "Politics stops at the water's edge?")
To: neverdem
we will continue to live in a fantasy world in which we do not develop our own oil, coal, gas, hydropower, wind power or nuclear and instead dream about hydrogen and ethanol and solar Pretty well sums it all up right there. There are some pretty funny lines in the article though. thanks.
8
posted on
01/30/2006 9:22:05 AM PST
by
subterfuge
(The Democrat party--hating American ideals for 60 years.)
To: neverdem
"Our policy is clear and has been unchanged for thirty years or more: produce little, use lots, and wonder why things never get better." Doesn't this also pertain to every other product we Americans use? It's all about international trade and one-worldism. Whether Bill O'Reilly's thoughts or yours are the closest to the truth, you just can't get away from the fact that it's the few controlling the lives of the many.
9
posted on
01/30/2006 9:28:53 AM PST
by
TheCrusader
("The frenzy of the mohammedans has devastated the Churches of God" Pope Urban II ~ 1097A.D.)
To: neverdem
Man, that's a good article.
10
posted on
01/30/2006 9:30:36 AM PST
by
PogySailor
(Semper Fi to the 3/1 H&S Company in Haditha.)
To: neverdem
Communists never sleep. They are behind the anti-energy movement.
11
posted on
01/30/2006 9:31:10 AM PST
by
MonroeDNA
(Look for the union label--on the bat crashing through your windshield!)
To: The_Republican
President should borrow some for tomorrow night!
With all due respect ... why? Unless he's willing to override the enviro-whackos there's not much left to be said.
Same goes for all the oil companies who said they're not drilling/pumping domestically because it's not profitable. BS.
12
posted on
01/30/2006 9:40:28 AM PST
by
oh8eleven
(RVN '67-'68)
To: oh8eleven
The people on the Left scream and howl at using our
natural resources and then scream and howl at Bush
for "fighting a war for oil." This country's future
has been hi-jacked by the prissy Left rich whose lives
resemble those of sniffy country squires residing in
private parks, safely removed from the dirty, disgusting
hoi polloi. "Let them eat cake" has become "let them
ride mountain bikes".
13
posted on
01/30/2006 9:41:44 AM PST
by
Sabatier
To: PogySailor; NonValueAdded; The_Republican; A message; All
Man, that's a good article.I thought so too. It seems to have covered all the bases with satire to boot. Yet it got yanked from the editorial sidebar. Go figure. Someone should post it there again.
14
posted on
01/30/2006 9:43:53 AM PST
by
neverdem
(May you be in heaven a half hour before the devil knows that you're dead.)
To: neverdem
Expensive and impractical in most places, so its currently a favorite. It would be perfect for providing electricity to isolated areas -- a market that could fuel the development and practicality of the technology for use elsewhere. Still not a favorite in scales that matter. Solar Two can pump 10 megawatts on average, and actually supplies power 24 hours a day, and it's only a technology test bed. But it takes several acres of land covered with mirrors and has a huge tower and a couple of big tanks in the middle of it, so the environuts aren't too happy.
A cool side benefit is that Sandia (which runs Solar Two) has used the mirror array to heat-test things for the DoD, and cooperation with the military is a definite no-no for the environuts.
Speaking of that, when these things go online, computer security should be paramount. Imagine some one hacking in to redirect the mirror array's multi-megawatt beam at a low-flying airplane. Okay, inverse square says at 20,000 feet the beam wouldn't be nearly as strong, but it could still be damaging.
To: Dog Gone; okie01
16
posted on
01/30/2006 9:44:58 AM PST
by
dirtboy
(My new years resolution is to quit using taglines...)
To: neverdem
Excellent article. We've been trying to drill in ANWR for, what, two decades? I despise liberal whackos.
17
posted on
01/30/2006 9:45:23 AM PST
by
citizen
(Yo W! Read my lips: No Amnistia by any name!)
To: Sabatier
This country's future has been hi-jacked by the prissy Left rich whose lives resemble those of sniffy country squires residing in private parks, safely removed from the dirty, disgusting hoi polloi.
(I'm an equal opportunity finger pointer.)
18
posted on
01/30/2006 9:46:09 AM PST
by
oh8eleven
(RVN '67-'68)
To: oh8eleven; roaddog727; The_Republican; TheCrusader
He's right and it's a shame because the GOP is just as guilty as the Dims.You guys aren't paying attention. The Republicans have been trying to change this for years. Most of it is in the President's energy proposal he sent to the hill. I think the House passed it but don't know about the Senate.
I happened upon Bill O'Reilly's radio program yesterday . I had never listened to him and I knew the voice sounded vaguely familiar but I thought it was some local liberal. He was complaining that the government didn't dictate what kind of cars we could drive and bashing "big oil". I thought this is the most ill informed and illogical idiot I ever heard. Several callers had called him Bill but that didn't ring a bell. Finally one called him O'Reilly and the light went on.
19
posted on
01/30/2006 9:51:38 AM PST
by
Mind-numbed Robot
(Not all that needs to be done needs to be done by the government.)
To: neverdem
20
posted on
01/30/2006 10:10:22 AM PST
by
talleyman
(Kerry & the Surrender-Donkey Treasoncrats - trashing the troops for 40 years.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-44 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson