Skip to comments.
Did George Bush say that Clinton is like a brother?
1/30/2006
| me
Posted on 01/30/2006 8:05:51 AM PST by Thomas Jefferson II
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-63 next last
To: WillT
He is sharper than you think. He knows exactly what he is doing. And it will work.
41
posted on
01/31/2006 9:08:26 AM PST
by
Thomas Jefferson II
(If we could harness the energy from our fore-fathers spinning in their graves)
To: martin_fierro
What a crock line. How close do you keep your enemies? They are compadres in the Globalist arena.
42
posted on
01/31/2006 9:10:15 AM PST
by
Thomas Jefferson II
(If we could harness the energy from our fore-fathers spinning in their graves)
To: martin_fierro
yunz don't get it. he said clinton is like a "brutha".
43
posted on
01/31/2006 9:12:35 AM PST
by
xsmommy
To: M203M4
Exactly what did you expect the sitting president of the United States to say about a woman who may be running for president?
Would you have liked for him to say some of the stuff we post about her on FR?
44
posted on
01/31/2006 9:15:27 AM PST
by
Howlin
(Why don't you just report the news, instead of what might be the news? - Donald Rumsfeld 1/25/2006)
To: txrangerette
No matter how big you make the font, some of them don't want to "get it," friend.
45
posted on
01/31/2006 9:16:17 AM PST
by
Howlin
(Why don't you just report the news, instead of what might be the news? - Donald Rumsfeld 1/25/2006)
To: WillT
and no matter how you slice it, Bush looks like a dolt for saying it.Sorry, you're wrong; if you had seen the entire interview, you'd know he was answering questions and he was LAUGHING while he was talking.
In fact, Barbara Bush made these very same JOKES months ago, laughing at her own husband and Bill Clinton to their faces at a fundraiser.
46
posted on
01/31/2006 9:20:33 AM PST
by
Howlin
(Why don't you just report the news, instead of what might be the news? - Donald Rumsfeld 1/25/2006)
To: WillT
Well, we'll have to agree to disagree on this.
I sometimes disagree with the man on policy, but I have never disagreed with him on style. In fact, I admire it profoundly and sometimes wonder who he does it. It makes his opponents seem even more unhinged than they actually are. In fact, it makes them even angrier at him.
I believe that President Bush gets considerable mileage out of being a gentleman. And as for the concept of being the sharpest knife in the drawera lot of people have been cut badly by thinking that. He may not be the sharpest, but he is plenty sharp.
To: pollyannaish
Well, I have plenty to disagree with him on policy, as he will go down as a big spender, unable to make progress on social security and immigration, among other things. But he displays a complete lack of sharpness on things like the Harriet Miers nomination, the "Mission Accomplished" debacle, the constant Bill Clinton coddling, even though Billy Boy kicks the crap out of him on policy while overseas !! Geez !! And it took Bush six months to finally realize he was being pummeled by the Demonrats and the press on Iraq !! He's better than any alternative from the other party, but he could be doing much better. I think we could all agree on that !!!
48
posted on
01/31/2006 10:38:17 AM PST
by
WillT
To: WillT
I do not like the spending either, although I don't singularly blame him for that. There is plenty of blame to go around, INCLUDING the population at large. So that does not rest solely on the President's shoulders, but he does bear some responsibility.
The Harriet Miers nomination was a flat out mistake. I give you that. But the Mission Accomplished thing was not. I still believe and understand what that was all about because...I actually listened to the speech at the time. He was very clear if one bothered to pay attention. HE IS NOT CODDLING the ex President. He is being polite. There is a huge difference. I am not going to explain it here, because it's pointless.
Finally, if you pay attention and watch, you will realize that the pummeling the President took on Iraq WAS INTENTIONAL. He is like a highly skilled fighter. If it was a random thing, I would agree with you, but it just isn't. It is coldly, consistently calculated. Ever single time. His opponents swing, and swing and swing. He doesn't fight back and he lulls them into a false sense of victory. They begin to look around and wave to their buddies. They believe themselves on the cusp of winning the argument. They've got him on the ropes.
Tired, but happy...they are about to take the big prize. They look around to make sure everyone is watching. They're winding up in a big blaze of glory for the final blow, when POW. Upside the head they get the knockout blow. Because the President has allowed them to shoot their reserves on pummeling him here, there and everywhere, while he was saving energy and focus for one solid knock out blow.
I'm telling you Will, it happens over and over again. He is not afraid to let it look like the other guy is winning, because in the end he knows that it is results that matter and results that win the game. That is the ONLY place that he focuses his energy. Not in the looks, in the results. Period.
Which is exactly why we have a Justice Alito today. And why he will kick butt tonight in the SOTU.
You don't have to like him. You can even hate the guy if you wish. But it is very hard, if you are paying attention, not to admire the sheer gutsiness of his style.
To: Thomas Jefferson II
50
posted on
01/31/2006 10:59:34 AM PST
by
38special
(Look it up...)
To: brownsfan
You may have a point. That might explain why a while back Bush senior honored none other that Teddy Kennedy. Unbelievable but true.
51
posted on
01/31/2006 11:00:44 AM PST
by
Dante3
To: Thomas Jefferson II
When W said that Bubba was like a brother to him, he was just drawing a parallel comparison to Roger, doncha know?
52
posted on
01/31/2006 11:01:55 AM PST
by
OB1kNOb
(Aiding, abetting, or harboring illegal aliens is itself illegal and punishable by law.)
To: pollyannaish
I don't hate the guy, never said I did....and the Alito thing is great, which makes up for the Miers mistake. But the spending thing is a big boo-boo with me, since Bush has not vetoed ONE spending bill in five years !!! And no comment about the Republican congress on spending. It's ridiculous !! The immigration proposal is a disaster too, it's going nowhere. The social security thing was a strategic disaster. As far as his move NOT to respond to critics for six months, that was another strategic mistake. The guy's polling numbers are pretty bad and have been for a year now. 42 percent is not good, whether the NYT did the numbers or Fox. And you can say the polling numbers are not quite accurate because of the poor sampling, but he is not a popular president, it's safe to say. I give Bush a ton of credit for taking on some big issues. But he is not a slam dunk for conservatives, unfortunately.
53
posted on
01/31/2006 11:21:39 AM PST
by
WillT
To: WillT
Well, think what you will. I think we've both explained our positions clearly and are not going to change each other's minds.
But one word of caution, If you think this President is a disaster...well, good luck with that because I've now been alive during eight Presidencies. This is one of the two best in my lifetime. Perhaps I just wasn't privy to the "great ones."
It's been nice talking to you. All we can do is wait and see. Meet back here in about 50 years? LOL.
To: Thomas Jefferson II
In the Christian sense. Maybe "W" thinks Bill can be redeemed. I certainly do.
As for the Ice Queen, that would take an overt act of God.
55
posted on
01/31/2006 11:31:15 AM PST
by
Antoninus
(The only reason you're alive today is because your parents were pro-life.)
To: pollyannaish
Just one correction: I never said Bush was a disaster. I'm just saying he has been great in certain instances but a disappointment in others, from a conservative standpoint. That is all. But I appreciate your comments and feedback.
56
posted on
01/31/2006 11:32:16 AM PST
by
WillT
To: brownsfan
Does anyone need any more proof that American politics is an elitist scam? They really are all the same. Corrupt, and power hungry.
It is disconcerting when you actually think about it. The same two families have been in control of the Executive Branch of government for the last 25 years: First it was George H. W. Bush (1981-1993), then Bill Clinton (1993-2001) and now George W. Bush (2001-present).
57
posted on
02/06/2006 10:39:44 AM PST
by
sheltonmac
(QUIS CUSTODIET IPSOS CUSTODES)
To: 38special
Barry and the Boys! You believe all of that stuff? HMM!
58
posted on
02/06/2006 11:05:32 AM PST
by
Thomas Jefferson II
(If we could harness the energy from our fore-fathers spinning in their graves)
To: pollyannaish
...well, good luck with that because I've now been alive during eight Presidencies. This is one of the two best in my lifetime. Perhaps I just wasn't privy to the "great ones." I have been alive as long as you [obviously, I have been alive for nine]. Other than GWB, who was the other great one?
59
posted on
02/06/2006 11:19:59 AM PST
by
Thomas Jefferson II
(If we could harness the energy from our fore-fathers spinning in their graves)
To: All
If I was George, I'd keep my daughters away, Bill might be into incest!!!!
60
posted on
02/06/2006 11:22:11 AM PST
by
twwtww
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-63 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson