[Pyro7480]

It's not a matter of "throwing out." It's a matter of interpretation. Evolution may be the best "scientific" explanation for life, but it has a hard time explaining how life began.

[MineralMan]

"Evolution may be the best "scientific" explanation for life, but it has a hard time explaining how life began."

That's odd. The Theory of Evolution does not even try to explain how life began. That's another area of study. So Evolution doesn't have a hard time explaining how life began at all. It doesn't address the issue.

[jec41]

It's not a matter of "throwing out." It's a matter of interpretation. Evolution may be the best "scientific" explanation for life, but it has a hard time explaining how life began.

Evolution theory does not try to explain how life began but only explains facts and empirical evidence for change.
Interpretation of philosophy without the constraints of philosophy is but opinion as often wrong as right.

[aNYCguy]

Evolution may be the best "scientific" explanation for life, but it has a hard time explaining how life began.

Gravity has a hard time explaining how life began, too. Strange, isn't it?