Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: PatrickHenry
Footnote to our discussion: Galileo's book remained on the Index Librorum Prohibitorum until 1822, which is well after Newton's work (mid 1600s)

True, but the blanket condemnations of all books teaching the Copernican universe as fact were lifted in the early 1700's, after which point such books were freely published and read throughout the Catholic world.

I'm not sure why Galileo's book remained on the index longer. It probably had something to with its insulting tone and lack of tact.

The clincher, for me, that the "authorized" version of the Galileo affair is wrong are these words from Galielo's inquisitor:

"I say that if there were a true demonstration that the sun was in the center of the universe and the earth in the third sphere, and that the sun did not travel around the earth but the earth circled the sun, then it would be necessary to proceed with great caution in explaining the passages of Scripture which seemed contrary, and we would rather have to say that we did not understand them than to say that something was false which has been demonstrated. But I do not believe that there is any such demonstration; none has been shown to me."

174 posted on 01/30/2006 6:41:21 PM PST by curiosity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 172 | View Replies ]


To: curiosity
The clincher, for me, that the "authorized" version of the Galileo affair is wrong are these words from Galileo's inquisitor:

That was written by Bellarmine in 1615. He died in 1621, a dozen years before the famous trial. Interesting letter, but not involved in the trial.

175 posted on 01/30/2006 6:48:08 PM PST by PatrickHenry (Virtual Ignore for trolls, lunatics, dotards, scolds, & incurable ignoramuses.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 174 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson