Replies

Of course you don't remember. You spend much of your time here slamming people, so why would you remember a specific incident. For the insults hurled at me, I had the whole thread removed. I searched for the following several months ago after you claimed you don't generally do that. BS.

=========================================

Posted by BCrago66 to William Creel
On News/Activism ^ 07/14/2005 4:24:26 PM PDT · 4 of 10 ^

When you write these lame vanities, it's important for you to remember that no one cares about your opinion.

Posted by BCrago66 to GeorgiaFreeper
On News/Activism ^ 07/09/2005 6:07:47 PM PDT · 13 of 33 ^

You're also almost as excitable as Andrew Sullivan. I mean, who cares about an Amazon book review?

Posted by BCrago66 to FrogMom
On News/Activism ^ 07/04/2005 9:01:50 AM PDT · 20 of 31 ^

Your original startment was not an inferential argument, but the assertion that:

"If you go down to political, it also shows Hitlery as the favorite to win the 2008 election, too."

That is flat out false (as Hillary is only listed as the favorite to win the Dem nomination) and you should admit it before you go on to make a second, inferential argument.

As to your inferential argument, it is faulty:

A will likely beat B
+
B will likely beat C
DOES NOT EQUAL
A will likely beat C

ERGO, so far you're 0 for 2.

Posted by BCrago66 to TriRyche
On Bloggers & Personal ^ 07/03/2005 9:41:05 AM PDT · 5 of 25 ^

Nobody cares about you. If you want to promote another party, go somewhere else, or at least start your own thread.

Posted by BCrago66 to rface
On News/Activism ^ 07/02/2005 4:49:15 PM PDT · 14 of 67 ^

Next time you get a really lame vanity, remember to put Worthless Vanity in the title, so as not to waste people's time.

Posted by BCrago66 to KerryKouldntKetchup
On News/Activism ^ 06/15/2005 10:36:22 AM PDT · 3 of 14 ^

Maybe you should try to figure out basic posting and linking procedures.

Posted by BCrago66 to NYC Republican
On General/Chat ^ 06/10/2005 8:25:54 AM PDT · 6 of 228 ^

Who cares? Waste of bandwidth.

Posted by BCrago66 to rawhide
On General/Chat ^ 04/04/2005 4:06:26 PM PDT · 6 of 20 ^

Lame vanity alert.

Posted by BCrago66 to GeekDejure
On News/Activism ^ 04/03/2005 11:29:31 PM PDT · 17 of 55 ^

Geek, you have won the award for the lamest, most worthless vanity of the week.

Posted by BCrago66 to Sender
On News/Activism ^ 04/01/2005 6:30:50 PM PST · 160 of 216 ^

Thanks for saying nothing.

Posted by BCrago66 to neutrino
On News/Activism ^ 03/31/2005 6:35:57 PM PST · 46 of 73 ^

Here's a tip: If you want to post a vanity stating what has already been said about 5,000 times, with no additional insight, just don't do it.

Posted by BCrago66 to watchdog_writer
On General/Chat ^ 03/31/2005 7:20:53 AM PST · 19 of 69 ^

The next time you have a vanity, be sure not to share it with anyone else.

Posted by BCrago66 to watchdog_writer
On News/Activism ^ 03/30/2005 7:08:49 PM PST · 29 of 149 ^

If you don't really have anything new to say, maybe you should cut back on the vanities.

Posted by BCrago66 to pabianice
On News/Activism ^ 03/30/2005 8:54:13 AM PST · 2 of 2 ^

Don't know how to link?

Posted by BCrago66 to LaserLock
On General/Chat ^ 03/27/2005 8:43:19 PM PST · 4 of 20 ^

You have a lot of free time.

sted by BCrago66 to al_again
On News/Activism ^ 03/20/2005 10:34:27 PM PST · 2,640 of 3,075 ^

You have no argument, really, except a worthless sanctimony which reveals you to be a person of inferior chracter.

Posted by BCrago66 to UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide
On News/Activism ^ 03/20/2005 10:01:10 PM PST · 2,349 of 3,075 ^

You're wrong, but the beauty part is you're going to be proven wrong within a couple hours.

So the only question is, will you hang around to admit you're wrong, or will you slink away?

Posted by BCrago66 to flaglady47
On News/Activism ^ 03/20/2005 9:33:44 PM PST · 2,006 of 3,075 ^

Next time you want to post Malbury v. Madison, just don't do it.

Posted by BCrago66 to sinkspur
On News/Activism ^ 03/20/2005 9:07:28 PM PST · 1,592 of 3,075 ^

Sinkspur again displays his constitutional retardation.

The Supreme Court's jurisdiction regarding this case is discretionary, and it's unlikely it will take up the case, especailly inasmuch as it already turned the case down.

Posted by BCrago66 to sinkspur
On News/Activism ^ 03/20/2005 8:59:39 PM PST · 1,486 of 3,075 ^

Sinkspur, you're consitutionally retarded.

Posted by BCrago66 to freedomdefender
On News/Activism ^ 03/20/2005 8:50:29 PM PST · 1,374 of 3,075 ^

Sinkspur is a constitutional illiterate.

Posted by BCrago66 to chris9soccer
On News/Activism ^ 03/20/2005 7:57:25 PM PST · 816 of 3,075 ^

The fact that a state judge found that Terri is in a permanent vegitative state doesn't mean she is in a permanent vegitative state. Human beings, including judges, are fallable. That's why we have federal habeas review with regard to death-penalty cases, and that's why we should have a similar federal review here. The stakes are high because life is important, anf the 14 Amendment protects life.

You would see that, Chris, if you were not so unbalanced and emotional on this issue. Maybe you should try to think about this issue, instead of merely expressing your feelings.

Posted by BCrago66 to mlmr
On Bloggers & Personal ^ 03/18/2005 6:10:19 PM PST · 3 of 46 ^

If you feel the need to VANITY, use one of the 20 threads already devoted to Terry.

Posted by BCrago66 to G.Mason
On News/Activism ^ 03/18/2005 5:58:43 AM PST · 55 of 832 ^

Yeah, well your intellectual worthlessness is showing. Did you really need to listen to Nealz Nuze before deciding what to think about the Terry Schiavo situation?

Posted by BCrago66 to The UPS man
On News/Activism ^ 03/15/2005 10:31:34 PM PST · 18 of 32 ^

Maybe your a drunk, but that's your problem, which you try to minimize spreading it around to all mankind. You're a drunk. I'm not. End of story.

Posted by BCrago66 to F14 Pilot
On Bloggers & Personal ^ 03/08/2005 12:44:59 AM PST · 23 of 103 ^

These pics are about 5 months old. What's next, articles about how President Bush got re-elected?

Posted by BCrago66 to soundandvision
On General/Chat ^ 03/04/2005 9:27:25 AM PST · 4 of 40 ^

Next time you have a Vanity, be sure not to share it with us

Posted by BCrago66 to djf
On News/Activism ^ 03/03/2005 3:07:07 AM PST · 20 of 106 ^

The next time you get excited about something, be sure to keep your feelings bottled up and never share them with anyone.

Posted by BCrago66 to Destro
On News/Activism ^ 03/01/2005 10:08:32 PM PST · 7 of 70 ^

I think we all learned in something like 7th grade that we like a republic, not a democracy; that elections are not of value without individual rights and the protection for minorities blah, blah, blah....

This is pretty worthless retarded basic material.

Posted by BCrago66 to GeronL
On News/Activism ^ 02/28/2005 12:45:30 AM PST · 3 of 8 ^

Maybe your should actually read the editorial before you comment. And do you get all those question marks at bulk rate or something?

Posted by BCrago66 to april15Bendovr
On News/Activism ^ 02/26/2005 7:25:07 PM PST · 8 of 70 ^

Just don't share your next random thought with anybody. It's important the you keep your emotions bottled up.

Posted by BCrago66 to Dan19
On General/Chat ^ 02/16/2005 9:42:17 PM PST · 33 of 75 ^

Maybe if Dan19 got married - to a man or woman - he'd have less time to populate this forum with worthless vanities.

Posted by BCrago66 to kcvl
On News/Activism ^ 02/16/2005 2:16:15 AM PST · 9 of 24 ^

Who gives a rat's ass?

Posted by BCrago66 to nostromo56
On News/Activism ^ 02/13/2005 7:03:52 PM PST · 7 of 32 ^

Next time you get a half-thought vanity, don't start a thread about it