Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 01/29/2006 8:30:08 PM PST by Tyche
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: SunkenCiv

ping


2 posted on 01/29/2006 8:32:27 PM PST by Tyche (It is easier to take life than to give it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tyche

If they are that old they belong in a museum.


3 posted on 01/29/2006 8:43:54 PM PST by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tyche

this is all a bunch of pc claptrap


4 posted on 01/29/2006 8:58:06 PM PST by MistrX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tyche
"I don't buy (the museum's) argument. Who else could they be culturally affiliated with?" said Jana Harcharek, former head of the Arctic Slope Regional Corp.'s cultural commission.

For someone employed in A CULTURAL capacity ("cultural commission"), this is an incredibly limited statement as to perspective, awareness, scope.

There are pockets of people on the planet even today who can't seem to understand -- or refuse to -- that the planet has been peopled by nomadic people for a longer while than is their contemporary history. People have settled areas, moved on or died out, and others have migrated in. Then they've either moved on or died out. But later peoples have again then moved into those once populated but now barren areas. And on and on.

Interesting suggestion as to those skulls, however, being "longer and taller" than this current group of people who are laying claim to them. Longer and thinner skulls certainly suggest people from Northern Europe, Northern Asia, compared with Southern Asian who are undoubtedly the ancestors of this current claim-laying group (being described as having "moved in from the south" which would indicate they were of Asian descend moving upward from South/Central America along the coast after temperatures were warmed). Some people need to read more. Let science explore the skeletal remains and arrive at some conclusions when/as possible but there's no harm done in studying them. I can't see why it would be objectionable (to study the skeletal remains), given their age and distinction.

5 posted on 01/29/2006 9:13:54 PM PST by MillerCreek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tyche
More PC sillyness. Anything 1000 years old is fair game for study in my book, even if they want to dig up my ancestors.. They would have wanted it that way. Just ask me, I'll tell you exactly what they would have wanted. I know exactly how they felt, its passed down in our family. /smirk
6 posted on 01/29/2006 9:15:38 PM PST by adamsjas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tyche; blam; FairOpinion; Ernest_at_the_Beach; StayAt HomeMother; 24Karet; 3AngelaD; asp1; ...
Thanks Tyche.

To all -- please ping me to other topics which are appropriate for the GGG list. Thanks.
Please FREEPMAIL me if you want on or off the
"Gods, Graves, Glyphs" PING list or GGG weekly digest
-- Archaeology/Anthropology/Ancient Cultures/Artifacts/Antiquities, etc.
Gods, Graves, Glyphs (alpha order)

7 posted on 01/29/2006 9:23:58 PM PST by SunkenCiv (In the long run, there is only the short run.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tyche

Just cremate. No more worrying about somebody digging up your corpse.


8 posted on 01/29/2006 9:23:59 PM PST by sagar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]




14 posted on 04/02/2006 1:53:30 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson