Skip to comments.
UN plans to release untapped wealth of $7 trillion (and solve the world's problems at a stroke)
Drudge ^
Posted on 01/29/2006 5:20:27 PM PST by Lunatic Fringe
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-76 next last
To: Lunatic Fringe
it does appear the UN is on the Lunatic Fringe.....
excuse me .... I couldn't resist....
To: Lunatic Fringe
The UN can bite my ass.
3
posted on
01/29/2006 5:22:52 PM PST
by
Viking2002
(Allah FUBAR!)
To: Lunatic Fringe
The UN. it's alway about someone else's money.
4
posted on
01/29/2006 5:23:17 PM PST
by
tet68
( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
To: Lunatic Fringe; B4Ranch
Just wait until there is a global depression, and the 'rats are back in power in DC. They'll be pushing for world government and a global banking system and single currency like you wouldn't believe.
5
posted on
01/29/2006 5:23:40 PM PST
by
Travis McGee
(--- www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com ---)
To: Lunatic Fringe
Top of the list is a challenge to the United States to join an international pollution permit trading system which, the UN claims, could deliver $3.64trn of global wealth. Clearly, someone needs to go back to school and learn the definition of "wealth".
6
posted on
01/29/2006 5:23:53 PM PST
by
Mr. Jeeves
("When the government is invasive, the people are wanting." -- Tao Te Ching)
To: Lunatic Fringe
How 'bout we start by giving Microsoft to the UN?
Declare all their stock is property of the UN and all their employees are UN employees...
Never mind.
7
posted on
01/29/2006 5:24:39 PM PST
by
Sundog
(cheers)
To: Lunatic Fringe
Without government intervention [holding a gun to their heads], firms and households have no incentive to limit their pollution.
8
posted on
01/29/2006 5:24:42 PM PST
by
kenth
To: Lunatic Fringe
"The price? An admission that the nation-state is an old-fashioned concept that has no role to play in a modern globalised world where financial markets have to be harnessed rather than simply condemned."
Now THAT is damned scary!
9
posted on
01/29/2006 5:24:54 PM PST
by
Clintonfatigued
(Sam Alito Deserves To Be Confirmed)
To: Lunatic Fringe
an unprecedented outbreak of co-operation between countries, applied through
six specific financial tools, would slice through the Gordian knot of problems that have bedevilled the world for most of the last century.
--
Got Milk "The Mark of the Beast" ?
10
posted on
01/29/2006 5:24:54 PM PST
by
NormsRevenge
(Semper Fi ... Monthly Donor spoken Here. Go to ... https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
To: Lunatic Fringe
"a challenge to the United States to join an international pollution permit trading system which, the UN claims, could deliver $3.64trn of global wealth. "
i.e., transfer $3.6trn of American wealth to Euroscum bureaucrats and Third World thieves.
Stiglitz would be better off using his economic skills trying to open up the "Kofi-jar" at the UN to a little more transparency.
To: Lunatic Fringe
The price? An admission that the nation-state is an old-fashioned concept that has no role to play in a modern globalised world where financial markets have to be harnessed rather than simply condemned.In other words, the U.N. Secretary General is the head of the world.
No.
To: Lunatic Fringe
backed by the UK, France, Italy, Spain, Sweden and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation B and M get ranked right up there, don't they?
13
posted on
01/29/2006 5:25:56 PM PST
by
Izzy Dunne
(Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus. Please help me spread by copying me into YOUR tag line.)
To: Izzy Dunne
Bill Gates should apply for membership.
His financial transactions are right up there with most member states.
14
posted on
01/29/2006 5:27:35 PM PST
by
Sundog
(cheers)
To: Lunatic Fringe
At the heart of the proposal, unveiled at a gathering of world business leaders at the Swiss ski resort of Davos, is a push to get countries to account for the cost of failed policies, and use the money saved "up front" to avert crises before they hit. I don't have a clue what this means or how it is theoretically supposed to be to be implemented.
In practice, though, I am fairly confident that it is just another scheme to transfer money from American taxpayers to corrupt UN diplomats and Third World tyrants. That seems to be the main function of the UN nowadays.
-ccm
15
posted on
01/29/2006 5:27:46 PM PST
by
ccmay
(Too much Law; not enough Order)
To: Lunatic Fringe
You bet your bippy.
Good grief; what a load of horse apples
16
posted on
01/29/2006 5:27:56 PM PST
by
don-o
To: Gribbles141
How are those jagoffs in Brussels doing with the EU? And they wish to up the ante.
17
posted on
01/29/2006 5:28:19 PM PST
by
Thebaddog
(K9 4ever)
To: Clintonfatigued
I have to agree. That statement scared the crap out of me. Not the statement on its own, but the fact that so many idiots buy into that kind of hogwash.
To: Gribbles141
No.
I was thinking something more like "he11, no."
19
posted on
01/29/2006 5:29:11 PM PST
by
Clara Lou
(A conservative is a liberal who has been mugged by reality. --I. Kristol)
To: Lunatic Fringe
From those most able to give to those most needy to recieve, or something like that.
You will have to get mine personally, and we shoot intruders at this ranch.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-76 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson