Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Chicago school kids learn CHINESE!
Vanity ^ | 1-29-2006 | Dick Bachert

Posted on 01/29/2006 4:43:03 PM PST by Dick Bachert

Just caught a network news segment on how the Chicago government schools – at the alleged urging of parents – are teaching kids there CHINESE, a language having 3 gazillion unique GRAPHIC – as opposed to our 26 alphabetical – characters and 4 or so basic SOUNDS!

They claim they’re doing this so our kids can COMPETE with the Chinese – most of whom are busy learning a much easier language: ENGLISH!!

I think teaching American kids Chinese is wonderful. These kids will then be able to explain why they are ignorant of biology, physics, math, basic science, etc. – IN CHINESE because their local educrats stole time from THOSE vital skills necessary for us to compete with the Europeans and the Chinese – to teach them CHINESE!


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: chinese; governmentschools; language; madness
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-159 next last
To: Javelina

My spoken Arabic tapes and CDs seem to be mainly Egyptian pronunciation. I am not making rapid progress, although some phrases sound a little clearer now.


121 posted on 01/29/2006 7:25:27 PM PST by RightWhale (pas de lieu, Rhone que nous)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: EGPWS

Hungarian is one of the most difficult languages.


122 posted on 01/29/2006 7:27:19 PM PST by A. Pole (Evolution has demonstrated that the optimal IQ is the average IQ !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Javelina
"So, if someone is inclined to go that route, it makes sense to learn these languages."

Fair enough, but how many of these public school Chicagoans are taking Chinese because they are 'inclined to go that route'? You know damn well, (especially in Chicago), that this is just another liberal, multi-cultural load of bilge that is wasting the taxpayers' money and the time of our kids who are already undereducated in the basics.

123 posted on 01/29/2006 7:28:10 PM PST by TheCrusader ("The frenzy of the mohammedans has devastated the Churches of God" Pope Urban II ~ 1097A.D.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
English tends to keep words in the spelling of the language they were borrowed from, or something close to it. The -able and -ible endings are often on words of Latin origin. The endings -ant and -ent are another source of spelling confusion. Sometimes it helps if you've had Latin and can remember which conjugation the Latin verb belongs to that the English word is derived from (to know how to spell the English word).

It would theoretically be possible to change to a completely phonetic system for English (by creating additional characters) but that would be far too much trouble for most people who already know how to read English.

Theodore Roosevelt believed in simplified spelling and had a list of revised spellings he wanted everyone to adopt...and got nowhere with it.

124 posted on 01/29/2006 7:33:23 PM PST by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: TheCrusader

Latin would be the best language for a first foreign language...the kids would have to learn grammar, and would improve their English vocabulary immensely. Plus, learning Spanish, Italian, French, Portuguese, Catalan, or Romanian later would be much easier.


125 posted on 01/29/2006 7:35:56 PM PST by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

Comment #126 Removed by Moderator

Comment #127 Removed by Moderator

To: RightWhale

Written Chinese is not simply a written form of Chinese ~ it is a different language. Written Chinese also has a different grammar.


128 posted on 01/29/2006 7:54:32 PM PST by muawiyah (-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale

Good thing they didn't stick you with learning the Jerusalem accent ~ neighbor kid with that accent started in at the Arabic language highschool here and really got criticized.


129 posted on 01/29/2006 7:56:30 PM PST by muawiyah (-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: Verginius Rufus
A totally phonetic English spelling system would, by some accounts I've read, require anywhere from 89 to over 120 different characters.

That's to accommodate everybody but the guys in Jamaica, eh!

130 posted on 01/29/2006 7:58:15 PM PST by muawiyah (-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: Javelina

English is the most widely spoken language on Earth. No single variety of Chinese is spoken as much, and you have to remember, those varieties are not mere "dialects", but full-blown languages with independent vocabularies and grammatical differences.


131 posted on 01/29/2006 7:59:45 PM PST by muawiyah (-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: Javelina
English arose as a creole of Old West Saxon and other Germanic languages. However, when it comes to vocabulary, English draws heavily on Greek, Latin and French.

Grammatically, English is nothing like any of it's Germanic predecessors. In fact, it's more like Chinese~!

132 posted on 01/29/2006 8:02:00 PM PST by muawiyah (-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

Comment #133 Removed by Moderator

To: Javelina
English is presently the world's most widespread "second language". In fact, there are more people speak it as a "second language" than as a "first language". I believe that is something unique ~ that's never happened before. Counting "first" and "second" language speakers, I believe English has a substantial edge over Mandarin.

Many of the folks counted as speaking Mandarin actually don't ~ they've been instructed in Mandarin to some degree but they go home and speak other languages.

134 posted on 01/29/2006 8:13:50 PM PST by muawiyah (-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]

To: Vince Ferrer
The radicals make it far easier to read the characters.

Oh, absolutely. But its no guarantee of accurate meaning! A good example would be-- suppose the following words were characters: "to" "get" "her". Putting them together would nett: "together" -- a word that is nothing like its components.

Still, knowing the radical and the number of strokes required to make the character, one can look it up in a Chinese dictionary with some measure of success.

I'm old fashioned. I like the old-style characters. I think the simplified are pretty ugly.

135 posted on 01/29/2006 8:21:31 PM PST by MrsEmmaPeel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: Javelina
The core vocabulary of English is mostly Germanic, but overall the words derived from Latin, from one of the Romance languages, or from Greek, are said to constitute over 50% of the total vocabulary.

German grammar is inflected enough to be a problem for English-speakers trying to learn the language, but too many endings are the same. Latin has more variety in the endings, so you can figure out the subject, direct object, indirect object, etc., usually from the ending. Even though English doesn't do that (except with pronouns to a degree) learning Latin forces you to learn the fine points of grammar.

English has a lot of words that are similar to German, but mostly because of common inheritance (father/Vater, foot/Fuss, starve/sterben, harvest/Herbst)...one Latin word often has many derivatives in English.

136 posted on 01/29/2006 8:33:21 PM PST by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah
I think the phonetic spelling systems that have been developed to help foreigners learn to pronounce English correctly get by with a lot fewer than 89 symbols. The main problem is that there are too many vowel sounds--the letter A doesn't just do service for "long A" and "short A" but for several different "short A" sounds, and the vowels in the written language are mostly diphthongs in reality.

I think the number of symbols needed is somewhere between 30 and 40--fewer if you use two-letter combinations like "sh" for the sound usually spelled "sh" in English.

Systems with 89 or more symbols are usually syllabaries (like the Cherokee syllabary invented by Sequoyah, or the Linear B syllabary used by the Mycenaean Greeks).

137 posted on 01/29/2006 8:40:30 PM PST by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

To: SamAdams76
In my neck of the woods you couldn't be more wrong. To get a good job here in Southern Oregon you need to speak Spanish. In My (college) Spanish class are several people that have lost good jobs because they didn't speak Spanish. Chinese may be important for multi-national companies, but here in good old rural America Spanish is still important. And BTW I think learning any other language helps you stretch your boundaries.
138 posted on 01/29/2006 9:01:22 PM PST by BruceysMom ("Scott Peterson is such an amateur!"-Michael Shiavo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: Javelina
"I guess I just think everyone should learn a foreign language, and Chinese (being the most spoken language on the planet) seems as good as any."

Chinese may be the 'most spoken language on the planet', but it's spoken nearly exclusively within the borders of China & Taiwan. Unless they plan on opening up a Chinese restaurant it won't help any of these Chicago kids.

As I already said, this will only take away precious time that should be spent on useful, essential studies which are sorely lacking in U.S. public schools. Studying Chinese should be a college elective, (and I doubt even most colleges teach it), not a public school mandatory subject.

139 posted on 01/29/2006 11:47:56 PM PST by TheCrusader ("The frenzy of the mohammedans has devastated the Churches of God" Pope Urban II ~ 1097A.D.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: Verginius Rufus
"Latin would be the best language for a first foreign language...the kids would have to learn grammar, and would improve their English vocabulary immensely. Plus, learning Spanish, Italian, French, Portuguese, Catalan, or Romanian later would be much easier because the Western languages derived from Latin."

BINGO! This man knows his stuff. Once you know Latin nearly every European language becomes easier. That's why many of the Popes could speak fluently in ten, twelve or more languages. They learned Latin first.

140 posted on 01/29/2006 11:51:53 PM PST by TheCrusader ("The frenzy of the mohammedans has devastated the Churches of God" Pope Urban II ~ 1097A.D.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-159 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson