Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Mind-numbed Robot
I don't have a problem with caveat emptor.

The point here is that government -- be it local, state, or federal -- will ultimately be on the hook here for all the people who default on their loans.

There's simply no way around that. So now, what do we do?

I suggest to you that for those whose property is covered by federally guaranteed flood insurance, rebuilding on the flood plain is insane. But, they have the moral and legal right to everything that the law provides.

Which is why I say, "pay them now, or pay them later."

133 posted on 01/29/2006 10:53:24 PM PST by CobaltBlue (Extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice. Moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies ]


To: CobaltBlue
If they have flood insurance, no problem, even if it is a federal subsidy. I thought Baker's plan was for all property owners whether they were insured or not. That was the rub for me, or if it would take insurance companies off the hook and put the taxpayer on it. Just as the flood waters, all this is still murky.
146 posted on 01/29/2006 11:11:59 PM PST by Mind-numbed Robot (Not all that needs to be done needs to be done by the government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson