I'm not impressed with Cboldt's analysis. There have been other lawyers on FR who have given a much more thorough analysis of the issues.
LOL well there are a hell of a lot of people here at FR that go to Cboldt when there is a question regarding the judiciary.
I doubt that you are even aware of the posts that contain my review and analysis of the case. I also have no problem with you having a closed mind.
There have been other lawyers on FR who have given a much more thorough analysis of the issues.
"Much more thorough" meaning that my analysis omits some points of argument that others covered. Which points?