Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: meema; T'wit; wildandcrazyrussian; 8mmMauser
Terri Schindler Schiavo was NOT an end of life decision. She had no written directives, she was not PVS, she had no wishes - those were dreamed up by the death lawyers. Michael wasn't going to starve Terri until Atty Bushnell introduced him to Atty Felos. When he found out he could get rid of Terri, Michael Schiavo started to work on the death process.

Atty Felos calls murder the "death process".

Terri's g-tube was no big deal and she'd used it for 15 years. That g-tube was not medical treatment back when she got it but it was medical treatment years later after the law was changed. THAT WAS ILLEGAL to change her nutrition and hydration into medical treatment making such a change retroactive so that she could get caught in a slippery slope.

Are any of our meals considered "medical treatment"? Of course not.

That she was murdered is preposterous. There are lots of adults and children who have feeding tubes. Some need them permanently and others only need them temporarily.

What about ports for chemo and insulin? That's medical treatment too so, should those people be killed too because they need a port???? It looks like Terri Schiavo was singled out.

232 posted on 01/29/2006 6:10:44 PM PST by floriduh voter (IMPEACH JUDGE GREER...Call Jeb Bush at 1-850-488-4441 and demand justice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 222 | View Replies ]


To: floriduh voter
One more time:

I am not here discussing Schindler vs. Schiavo. I have nothing to say about them.

239 posted on 01/29/2006 6:18:09 PM PST by meema (I am a Conservative Traditional Republican, NOT an elitist, sexist , cynic or right wing extremist!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 232 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson