Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: marajade
And there's still that little matter in the US Constitution that gives any person who is born within the US becomes a citizen.

The intention of that amendment should be taken in context. It was implicitly intented to address the naturalization of former slaves.

If we were to take your logic, the second amendment's 'militia' would mean (the modern perception) state militia, rather than the meaning of the word when it was first written down...as noted in the Constitutional notes via madison or others.

98 posted on 01/29/2006 11:59:32 AM PST by Rick_Michael
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]


To: Rick_Michael

What amendment number is that?


101 posted on 01/29/2006 12:02:25 PM PST by marajade (Yes, I'm a SW freak!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies ]

To: Rick_Michael
"...the second amendment's 'militia' would mean (the modern perception) state militia, rather than the meaning of the word when it was first written down...as noted in the Constitutional notes via madison or others."

The very same parallel occurred to me a few days ago.

It is imperative to take into consideration the intentions behind the words in the Constitution.

It's astounding that someone can claim that the 14th excludes children of diplomats -here LEGALLY, mind you- but includes those that are criminally within our borders.

202 posted on 01/29/2006 8:53:35 PM PST by moehoward
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson