Even though I view ID as fake science and bad religion, it is appropriate in this context:
1. It is called philosophy, not science. (It is bad philosophy also, IMHO, but at least they are not pretending it is science).
2. It is an elective.
3. It is at the college level.
Look, we have courses in the US on the sociology of TV sitcoms. Teaching ID in that context can't be all that bad. It's when they compare ID to, well, biology or physics that I have a problem.
Agreed. This doesn't bother me. But I don't think I need to ping the list.