Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

We need to make sure the pollitical alignment of the Kelo supreme court majority stays in the limelight every time the left tries to shift the agenda to any other legal consideration. Eminent domain can bury them and all the whining at DU can not make the Kelo 5 coservatives.
1 posted on 01/29/2006 7:19:47 AM PST by MrEdd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: MrEdd
Here's something this government agency might want to read:

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

2 posted on 01/29/2006 7:24:55 AM PST by MineralMan (godless atheist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MrEdd
Someone get these folks in contact with the ADF (American Defense Foundation) they are the good guys and they are helping beat back successfully that,............. yuck ................ other legal abomination that has plagued the nation for far far far too long.
3 posted on 01/29/2006 7:27:14 AM PST by SandRat (Duty, Honor, Country. What else needs to be said?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MrEdd

Looks like the arrogance of these city pols will be met with a well deserved thunderous backlash.


4 posted on 01/29/2006 7:28:02 AM PST by demkicker (democrats and terrorists are familiar bedfellows)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MrEdd
Citizens are the enemy of government. And it's going to get worse.
9 posted on 01/29/2006 7:38:41 AM PST by Glenn (What I've dared, I've willed; and what I've willed, I'll do!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MrEdd

On a serious note, this is what the recall process is designed for. It's time for folks to let their local, recallable, officials understand that such "takings" are not going to be tolerated. A few recalls of entire city councils or county boards will soon put an end to such crap.

We the people have the power. It's just a matter of using it.


11 posted on 01/29/2006 7:44:48 AM PST by MineralMan (godless atheist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MrEdd
The Consitituion, in the First Amendment, enumerates very specifically these citizens' absolute RIGHT to petition their government.

No law...and therefore no law suit...can be brought or filed against them for simply exercising that right. If there is not more to this, then what these city officials are doing is blatantly unconstitional and tyranical.

12 posted on 01/29/2006 7:48:49 AM PST by Jeff Head (www.dragonsfuryseries.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MrEdd

Reading the article, it sounds more like the city is trying to get a court to rule that, despite the petition, the city council's decision is not subject to being overturned by ballot vote -- as distinct from suing the petitioners for monetary damages for the offense of doing a petition


20 posted on 01/29/2006 9:13:54 AM PST by SauronOfMordor (A planned society is most appealing to those with the hubris to think they will be the planners)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MrEdd

It really makes one wonder where the ACLU is in all of this. I thought they were supposed to protect our liberties......Oh I forgot thats not their real goal..their REAL goal is to promote their aganda, Communism,Socialism and the Perverts at NAMBLA...


24 posted on 01/29/2006 10:06:44 AM PST by democratsaremyenemy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MrEdd

Did anybody notice the lawsuit wasn't analyzed? What is the city asking the court to do, invalidate the petition, strike or disallow standing, enjoin, what?


25 posted on 01/29/2006 10:17:04 AM PST by Old Professer (Fix the problem, not the blame!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MrEdd

The Supreme Court may have decided that our Constitution does not prohibt cities from practicing "eminent domain." I hadn't noticed that in so doing it removed the right of citizens to say something about it, or to change it on a local level. In fact IIRC the Court specifically encouraged citizens to prohibit the practice on the local level if they wished.


27 posted on 01/29/2006 10:37:46 AM PST by Sam Cree (absolute reality) - ("Reality is merely an illusion, albeit a very persistent one." Albert Einstein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MrEdd

Isn't that just the most awful thing.

Imagine citizens that organize to reach their neighbors...for the purpose of the Constitutional right to petition their government...abide by the Constitution.

Vive le liberte!


30 posted on 01/30/2006 2:38:28 AM PST by joyspring777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson