Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Molly T.
....I know, I think by law, the National Guard isn't supposed to do that sort of thing in our country....but then what's wrong with putting some of our military down there.

I think you have it backwards...the Guard can be deployed for stuff like this, that is why we have them. The active military cannot be deployed, for combat, on our soil.

Heavy emphasis on the "I think" part.

LVM

22 posted on 01/29/2006 7:27:27 AM PST by LasVegasMac (The only thing slowing me down is the A**hole in front of me!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]


To: LasVegasMac

Hey, thanks....I very definately think you are right, and I have it backwards.


30 posted on 01/29/2006 8:09:56 AM PST by Molly T.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

To: LasVegasMac
the Guard can be deployed for stuff like this, that is why we have them. The active military cannot be deployed, for combat, on our soil.

There is absolutly no reason our military can not be deployed to protect and defend our nation's borders.

62 posted on 01/29/2006 6:10:17 PM PST by TLI (ITINERIS IMPENDEO VALHALLA, Minuteman Project AZ Day -1 to Day 8, Texas Minutemen El Paso, 32 Days)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson