Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ChildOfThe60s

"Granted, the severity of the penalty is certainly debatable; this concept of confiscating vehicles is asinine."

That was my real point, although I probably did not state it as well as I should have. Believe me, I hate loud music as much as anyone, but this law is quite punitive in the way it's currently written.

In addition, there are noise ordinances and laws against disturbing the peace that could already be used against this type of thing, so why would they need to enact new laws?


183 posted on 01/30/2006 6:11:30 AM PST by webstersII
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies ]


To: webstersII
there are noise ordinances and laws against disturbing the peace that could already be used against this type of thing, so why would they need to enact new laws?

Yep. If they actually enforced the current statutes they could get a grip on it. But they really don't care about enforcing them. This is another excuse to take property. Another cash cow. It has absolutely nothing to do with solving a community problem. When an elected official tells you he cares about you it is time to be afraid.

190 posted on 01/30/2006 3:00:57 PM PST by ChildOfThe60s (If you can remember the 60s......you weren't really there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 183 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson