Posted on 01/29/2006 5:25:40 AM PST by ARealMothersSonForever
Bob Woodward and photographer injured in IED attack.
You'll have to tune in catch the story yourself. Don't worry, you won't turn into a pillar of salt if you do.
So what's the injured Iraqi soldier's condition? What treatment is he receiving?
Stay off this thread.
NO, you are a foolish person. I guess a worthy Imus listener. You think that I am angry? Indeed. The last refuge of someone who has nothing to say. You should be embarassed about listening to Imus. I make substantive points about how insipid the show is, and you seek to dismiss me as an angry nut. I guess that it the tactic when you have nothing to say. I had guessed that your whole Hillsdale gambit was shallow and empty. Well, this says more about you than me. Enjoy.
Why is that?
Bennett acted cowardly during that period and life is just too short to play with folks like you. Please, have a nice day.
Because it's something to trash a dying man with. Any questions? :-)
Hmmmm.... must need more coffee.
I don't understand how teaching law in China could be taken as a slander against anyone. Seems like an accomplishment to me.
See if you can figure it out:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1567797/posts?page=1#1
Thank you...they are always amazed by the thanks- and are grateful in return:)
He is not wearing Level 4 body armour with ceramic plate, crouch protector, chest side wall protection, and shoulder/neck protection as the press demanded our troops were just a few weeks ago.
Actually, ABC reported this morning that he was, in fact, wearing custom made armor.
Couldn't that photo have been taken inside the wire at Taji? If so, he wouldn't have been obliged to wear body armor unless they were on yellow or red alert.
In your honor, I lned to 10 minutes of Biden on Imus just now.. Typical. Enjoy. Seek your level.
It was; they showed it on ABC this morning.
OK, now I see. In character with other comments here, t&l is insinuating that teaching law in China makes him a de facto commie. Got it. Absurd.
LOL! Anytime you need to gripe- feel free to freepmail me...deployments are hard work for families too:)
Oh dear...Murtha? Sincere & noble? Pity your brother..he's married to her:)
Just to clarify, if that photo was from inside the wire, there is no obligation for any civilian to wear body armor unless on alert.
I suspect they may have been getting ready to saddle-up, and still inside Taji, because those fellows he's talking to would certainly (and I mean without question) have insisted that he or any other civilian wear protective gear outside the wire. It's preposterous and absurd to think the troops would have let him ride along without at least a vest and helmet. Unthinkable. Not happening.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.