To: saveliberty
People who follow politics and know history... understand how
series a problem Iran has become. While even some 'less sanguine' Republicans/conservatives were not so hot about invading Iraq... action in Iran crosses over party lines.
The implications of a nuclear-armed Iran sends shivers down the spine of ANY thinking human being.
310 posted on
01/29/2006 7:03:36 AM PST by
johnny7
(“Iuventus stultorum magister”)
To: johnny7
The implications of a nuclear-armed Iran sends shivers down the spine of ANY thinking human being.Unfortunately the FEELERS in society have taken the microphone and thinkers cannot get a word in edgewise.
318 posted on
01/29/2006 7:06:45 AM PST by
small voice in the wilderness
(The Culture of Corruption hurts. But it's the dems. Corruption of Culture that destroys.)
To: johnny7
The implications of a nuclear-armed Iran sends shivers down the spine of ANY thinking human being. You are correct, but I am enjoying the Dems that have pilloried the President for being so gung-ho on the WOT, trying to be hawkish on Iran without using GWB's own arguments.
319 posted on
01/29/2006 7:06:58 AM PST by
A.Hun
(Common sense is no longer common.)
To: johnny7
The implications of a nuclear-armed Iran sends shivers down the spine of ANY thinking human being.
Worse then Hitler with a Nuke. Think rabid religious fundamentalist suicide cult Hitler Clone with a nuke who "KNOWS" his god will "reward" him in the afterlife for killing you. A person who regularly indulgence in Apocalyptic rants about the Final Jihad and the Hidden Imam. Hard to believe but there ARE nations in the world even less suit to have nukes then North Korean
323 posted on
01/29/2006 7:09:10 AM PST by
MNJohnnie
(Is there a satire god who created Al Gore for the sole purpose of making us laugh?)
To: johnny7
Oh no question. But the premise of the left, even someone who laments that the Democratic party has lost its brains, is that we can't figure it out for ourselves.
328 posted on
01/29/2006 7:10:00 AM PST by
saveliberty
(Proud to be Head Snowflake, Bushbot and a new member of Sam's Club)
To: johnny7
While even some 'less sanguine' Republicans/conservatives were not so hot about invading Iraq... action in Iran crosses over party lines. Despite the recent attempts of the George Orwell led Democrat party to rewrite history, support for invading Iraq crossed over party lines very strongly.
The resolution (HJ Res 114) to authorize the use of any and all military force that the President deemed necessary was 296-133 in the House and 77-23 in the Senate. That's incredibly strong bipartisan support, given the makeup of the dims in Congress.
661 posted on
01/29/2006 9:09:37 AM PST by
Phsstpok
(There are lies, damned lies, statistics and presentation graphics, in descending order of truth)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson