Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: LdSentinal

Very simple. Either all 7 of the Dems in the "gang of 14" honor their commitment not to filibuster, or all 7 of the Pubs in the group vote for the constitutional option. No problem.


2 posted on 01/28/2006 8:49:20 PM PST by Emile (Welcome to New Orleans, aka "The Big Chocolate")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Emile
or all 7 of the Pubs in the group vote for the constitutional option. No problem.

Right. Susan Collins has not even decided if she is going to vote for Alito. Snowe just reluctantly announced her support. You expect them to support the constitutional option? And those are just two of the problems.

30 posted on 01/28/2006 10:22:32 PM PST by ModelBreaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Emile

now if stevens and ginsberg would both die
i would have to think about this anymore.


44 posted on 01/29/2006 12:28:00 AM PST by genghis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Emile

I think the Dems believe they'll win the presidency in '08.

With a minority in the Senate or a bare majority in the Senate, they would need the rules change about voting on judges in order to get their justice nominees approved.

But...the Constitution was written with the nomination process intended to go forward. It was not written with a bizarre Senate rule about unlimited debate in mind.


50 posted on 01/29/2006 3:25:56 AM PST by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson