Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: strategofr
"There is a clear sense on how effective they were," noted Shaw. "The fact that the CIA did not know shows just how successful the Russian operation was," he concluded. John Shaw, the former deputy undersecretary for international technology security.

Well since you're the deputy blah, blah, I guess that you did tell the CIA, so the CIA does know, or the CIA doesn't believe you.

I've always wondered why Bush got off the WMD bandwagon so early. Perhaps it's stratergy: as first we needed to find Saddam; and now it's we've got to get Iraq under control, so we can redeploy our troops to fire the new weapons stockpile that has been building after the depletion in Afganistan.

Sounds like this war on terror is going to have many fronts. We poked the stick in the hornets nest, lets hope that we've got the troops and the backing of the democRAT half of the US population

This could get real ugly, real fast.

142 posted on 01/30/2006 12:03:33 PM PST by aShepard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: aShepard; strategofr
Well since you're the deputy blah, blah, I guess that you did tell the CIA, so the CIA does know, or the CIA doesn't believe you.

Logic/reason can be a pain in the arse, eh?

144 posted on 01/30/2006 12:13:25 PM PST by Godwinson ("The desire to rule is the mother of heresies." -- St. John Chrysostom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson