Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

INDICTING HILLARY - the trailer for the documentary is online now ...... film release in May 2006
google videos ^ | 1-28-06 | Doug from Upland

Posted on 01/28/2006 7:59:25 PM PST by doug from upland

Edited on 01/29/2006 4:22:05 PM PST by Admin Moderator. [history]

A roughcut trailer for our film INDICTING HILLARY: One Man's Quest to Hold Hillary Clinton Accountable can now be downloaded from google videos.

Watch -- INDICTING HILLARY

This trailer is only a roughcut, and we hope to have an improved version out soon. It only touches the surface in exposing the largest campaign finance fraud ever. We are working furiously to have the first version of the film ready for a conference in Washington, D.C., in early May. Thereafter, we hope to have an extended version of the film for theatrical release. It's all a function of money. No big time Hollywood producer has come forward to open a checkbook as they did for the anti-American's crockumentary of President Bush. Our film really is different. It is filled with something called the truth.

Peter Paul still needs financial help with his civil case. It would have been much easier and he would have been much further along had Judicial Watch actually spent the millions they collected for his case.

We have been working with a very honorable man from the United States Justice Foundation, Gary Kreep, Yes, Hillary, Bill, and others are going to be under oath in a Los Angeles courtroom sometime later this year. Spinning attorney David Kendall is making his last gasp effort to have Hillary removed from the case.

For those who do not know the story, here are 26 episodes of PETER PAUL AND HILLARY

Great info is available on HillCAP.org.

NOTE TO HILLARY RODHAM CLINTON -- this is not going away. You have denied, delayed, dissembled, and distracted for far too long. You have been in this scandal from your fat ankles all the way up to your eyeballs. We have the smoking guns to prove that you allowed your campaign treasurer, Andrew Grossman, to file a third fraudulent report to the FEC on July 30, 2001. Your denials are BS. Even you cannot hide forever.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: campaignfraud; fec; financefraud; fraud; hillary; hillaryscandals; indictinghillary; orangejumpsuit; peterpaul
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 161-165 next last
To: doug from upland

Fantastic, Doug!


101 posted on 01/29/2006 2:38:46 PM PST by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland

(NOTE: if after she was in possession of bill, invoices, bank statements, receipts, and cancelled checks, Hillary allowed her treasurer, Andrew Grossman to file a third fraudulent report to the FEC. A press conference was held at the National Press Club, and a courier delivered the following demand letter to her Senate office. No, folks, Hillary cannot say she didn't know. Nevertheless, she allowed Grossman to perpertuate the fraud. She was at least complicit in the fraud and likely directed the whole thing.)





Peter Paul demand letter to Hillary Clinton



July 16, 2001

Senator Hillary Clinton

U.S.Senate

Washington, DC


Via Hand Delivery

Dear Hillary:

It is with profound regret and extreme disappointment that I am forced to write this letter to you reminding you of your responsibility as a Federal elected official to comply with the laws and regulations of the United States that you have sworn to defend and protect, and as a citizen, the same laws and regulations that govern your individual conduct.

As you are personally aware, in May, 2000, I was induced by your National Campaign Finance Director, David Rosen, your friend Jim Levin and your volunteer Hollywood talent coordinator and fundraiser, Aaron Tonken, to become the largest individual contributor to your Senatorial campaign in an effort to begin building a closer relationship with your husband in anticipation of his departure from public service to the private sector.

As you recall, I hosted a private fundraising luncheon for you at Spago, and a fund raising tea at Mrs. Gershman’s Beverly Hills Estate on June 9, 2000, and paid certain expenses in connection with that event in addition to making a commitment to contribute $150,000 in stock to your campaign. I subsequently committed to produce and underwrite the largest fundraiser of your campaign, which was also a Hollywood farewell tribute to the President, on August 12, 2000, at the Brentwood estate of our mutual friend Ken Roberts. Rather than make an additional contribution to your campaign, I was induced to underwrite all the expenses of the reception, concert and private dinner so that David Rosen could galvanize your faltering fundraising momentum and generate much needed “hard money” contributions net of any and all expenses. In good faith I fulfilled that commitment, even as the expenses skyrocketed from a projected $500,000 to well over $2 million!

No expense was spared to produce a poignant and historic evening when the luminaries of the entertainment industry shared their love and appreciation for the contributions made by the President and yourself during the previous eight years of the Clinton Administration. As you requested, I hired your friend Gary Smith to produce the concert part of the event, which he did superbly through his lend out company Black Ink Productions. Although Gary’s unconscionable fee of $850,000 for the concert was reduced at my request by $50,000 due to your personal intervention, you should know that Gary subsequently tacked on another $75,000 for his personal production fee which I was not made aware of until the day before the event. Further, Gary demonstrated the most egregious unprofessionalism in the way he sabotaged my script for Stan Lee’s introduction and the activities of his film crews that were charged with documenting the event. To add insult to injury, he fabricated additional expenses that Ken Roberts chastised him for, for which he held hostage the tapes of the event for three months. In addition, $20,000 is unaccounted for as a final withdrawal that is not documented from the segregated event bank account I am attaching a statement for.

I enjoyed your warmth and friendship during this period from June through August, 2000, when you and the President made my wife and I feel like family. Your warm letters and phone calls, your embraces and kisses when we met, the meals and events we shared together, and especially your and Chelsea’s heartfelt introduction of my wife to Barbara Streisand, led me to believe that we had succeeded in forging a real family friendship. Unfortunately these feelings were, at best, short lived.

Starting with your campaign spokesmen’s “Judas Strategy,” employed when they twice disavowed me, and my contributions to your campaign, to the Washington Post, thereby lying to the people and the media, I witnessed that side of your personality that I had always believed was an invention of your political enemies. I continued with the erroneous assumption that it was only political expediency for your Senate campaign and the national Presidential campaign, that required less than honest candor in acknowledging our relationship because of the sensitivities generated by my anti-Communist misjudgments a quarter century ago. I even believed David Rosen’s and Jim Levin’s reassurances that after the election we could resume our budding friendship.

Just a few days after the events in Los Angeles I was forced to ignore your campaign’s gutless and insulting decision to return the $2,000 check I gave you as part of the June 8, luncheon commitment, and the insensitivity of your statements that you would not accept ANY contribution whatsoever from me. This statement was made only days after you received the largest individual campaign contribution to a single candidate ever recorded in American history! So, a month later when David Rosen begged me to further contribute $55,000 to an abortion rights group that you had committed to based on my commitment relating to the Spago lunch, I ignored my better judgment and the more than $1.5 million I had already contributed on your behalf, so that your word would not be compromised.

Thereafter, from November, 2000, I was preoccupied with the business and market issues that all internet related companies were dealing with, as well as more insidious and nefarious issues relating to actions taken by company management and others intent on ruining me and the company I founded. When your promised support for the first global broadcast of the Hollywood Christmas Parade we produced did not materialize, and the invitations offered to dinners and gatherings were withdrawn, and after making the final contribution on your behalf at David Rosen’s direction in October, the only communication I received from you, the President, or your intermediaries, was an irate e-mail from Jim Levin in November protesting my failure to make a $250,000 payment to the Clinton Library as I had committed to do in August.

Thereafter, the “dot com” meltdown of the last quarter of 2000, resulted in my company, Stan Lee Media, along with more than 230 others, going into bankruptcy and the usual fingerpointing between management and others regarding whose fault it was. In my case, because of the Washington Post articles about my Cuban and cocaine convictions from the late 1970’s, I became a vulnerable scapegoat by all those wishing to avoid responsibility for their willful misconduct.

Thus, in late February, after I had made numerous calls for several months to David Rosen about how you were going to report my contributions to the FEC to ensure their legality, I was shocked to discover through internet access to your campaign filings, that all my contributions to you and your campaign were not reported, that the only report, relating to the Hollywood Gala, was false as to the identity of the donor and the amount donated, and that you had thereby made me a co-conspirator with you and others in violating various Federal statutes and regulations.

This was the fatal blow to any vestiges of friendship and respect that I may have retained towards you and the President, and it is this final betrayal that has precipitated my new adversarial posture towards you both, and your co-conspirators. I am now required by my conscience and sense of fair play to demand that you abide by the laws you swore to defend and uphold, which includes the requirement set out in Title 11 of the Code of Federal Regulations that you return all “illegal contributions within 30 days of determining the illegality.”

The accounting provided in the attached copy of my Federal Election Commission complaint shall also serve as my notice to you and your Senate Campaign Committee, of the amount of the direct, in-kind contribution I made to you and your Senate campaign, and no other, and of the statutory requirement you have to return such monies, which statute you have been in violation of since March 1, 2001, thirty days after the amended filing of your FEC report which through their false reports made my contributions illegal de jure.

Rather than perpetuating the signature Clinton ethic of denial, semantical and rhetorical responses to valid requests and questions, and stonewalling, it is time to accept your responsibility as a Federal elected official and do the right thing according to the letter of the law, the position your campaign spokespeople have taken, and natural laws of right and ethical conduct, and return the contributions I made, which you have by your collective actions, made illegal. Please direct your refund to my counsel at Judicial Watch.

Govern Yourself Accordingly,


Peter F. Paul


102 posted on 01/29/2006 2:42:35 PM PST by doug from upland (INDICTING HILLARY -- now that is something that's good for America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kcvl
More than a month after publicly distancing themselves from Peter, Bill personally meets him after stepping out of AF-1 in Los Angeles. He assures Peter that they still have a deal. Peter sends another 55K in the form of a stock transfer for Hillary to the Working Families Party in New York.

In the picture are the disgraced and impeached former president, Aaron Tonken, Peter Paul, and Gray Davis. Who wants to see Gray as a witness in Los Angeles?


103 posted on 01/29/2006 2:46:42 PM PST by doug from upland (INDICTING HILLARY -- now that is something that's good for America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: The Mayor

Please direct them to this thread. I want people to have the links for HillCAP and the PETER PAUL AND HILLARY series. Thanks.


104 posted on 01/29/2006 2:47:23 PM PST by doug from upland (INDICTING HILLARY -- now that is something that's good for America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland

The canvas seatbacks were kept by the audience as souveneirs. I have one of just a handful signed by the impeached one himself. How much would that be worth to a Clinton sick-o-fant? I'll take bids. :)


105 posted on 01/29/2006 2:51:50 PM PST by doug from upland (INDICTING HILLARY -- now that is something that's good for America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
Will producer Gary Smith commit perjury in the civil trial? We shall see.


106 posted on 01/29/2006 2:53:41 PM PST by doug from upland (INDICTING HILLARY -- now that is something that's good for America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
Chelsea thank you note to Peter. With her dad coming aboard, Peter also offered her a job. Yep, this whole sting was a family affair.


107 posted on 01/29/2006 2:58:02 PM PST by doug from upland (INDICTING HILLARY -- now that is something that's good for America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland

Fat Bottomed Girl shaking the money tree, eh?


108 posted on 01/29/2006 3:00:14 PM PST by sauropod ("Here Lies Joe Biden, Buried Under His Own Words.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
Hillary's attorney was served with the civil lawsuit on July 11, 2001. Oh, but Hillary didn't know anything.


109 posted on 01/29/2006 3:00:52 PM PST by doug from upland (INDICTING HILLARY -- now that is something that's good for America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #110 Removed by Moderator

To: All
The Spago fundraising lunch was wonderful. $7,500 to Wolfgang Puck; $20,000 to Dionne Warwick.

AMOUNT DECLARED BY CAMPAIGN: Zero

111 posted on 01/29/2006 3:04:21 PM PST by doug from upland (INDICTING HILLARY -- now that is something that's good for America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #112 Removed by Moderator

To: doug from upland

OK..


113 posted on 01/29/2006 3:06:49 PM PST by The Mayor ( As a child of God, prayer is kind of like calling home everyday.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland

Check it out!
http://albanysinsanity.speakupwny.com/


114 posted on 01/29/2006 3:10:58 PM PST by The Mayor ( As a child of God, prayer is kind of like calling home everyday.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: All
EXPLANATION FOR DIFFERENT NUMBERS:

Peter believes that he spent upwards of $2 million on Hillary. He was able to provide documentation to both Hillary and treasurer Andrew Grossman of $1.6 million when he filed the civil suit. In the David Rosen trial, the FBI was using the number of approximately an additional $1.1 million that should have been declared. In the third fraudulent FEC report, just over 400K was reported ---- but none of that money was attributed to Peter.

115 posted on 01/29/2006 3:14:42 PM PST by doug from upland (INDICTING HILLARY -- now that is something that's good for America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Mayor

Great. Thanks.


116 posted on 01/29/2006 3:15:34 PM PST by doug from upland (INDICTING HILLARY -- now that is something that's good for America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: All
David Rosen is seen here meeting Tendo Oto outside the event. Hmmm, he is a foreigner. Hmm, should we let him into the event? Sure. Let's get Bill to approve it. Should he have been allowed to pay $2K for the ticket and $25K for the dinner? Sure, why not. Who will ever find out?


117 posted on 01/29/2006 3:20:43 PM PST by doug from upland (INDICTING HILLARY -- now that is something that's good for America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
Here's a good idea. As long as the illegal foreign donor has given money, and as long as he is attending this function illegally, Hillary would love to have Tendo sit right behind her. Campaign finance laws? We don't need no stinking campaign finance laws.


118 posted on 01/29/2006 3:23:30 PM PST by doug from upland (INDICTING HILLARY -- now that is something that's good for America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
Perhaps this is where Jim Levin (Bill's eyes and ears in the deal) and the impeached X42 hatched the plan. Here's what we'll do, Bill. Take Peter's money and pretend to go along with it. I'll fly to Japan and make our own deal with Oto. When Oto does not give the promised $7 mil to Stan Lee Media, it will collapse the company. That should work.


119 posted on 01/29/2006 3:27:21 PM PST by doug from upland (INDICTING HILLARY -- now that is something that's good for America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
John Travolta insisted upon sitting at the Clinton table and making the only toast to the impeached x42. Brad and Jennifer graciously accepted sitting at another table.


120 posted on 01/29/2006 3:31:14 PM PST by doug from upland (INDICTING HILLARY -- now that is something that's good for America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 161-165 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson