To: hubbubhubbub
If it is used by the administration to vindicate the Iraq invasion, then it follows that President Bush is ready to move against Syria and Iran. But if President Bush and his advisors ignore Sadas testimony, it is a sign that the administration is worn out by criticism and incapable of smashing Americas enemies.
These things are not necessarily so.
They could ignore Sada because Sada could be wrong, whether intentionally or unintentionally.
36 posted on
01/28/2006 7:48:38 PM PST by
xzins
(Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It!)
To: xzins
What Sadr says at this point is of little consequence. The 800 lb gorilla is the literally millions of Iraqi Defense Ministry documents seized shortly after the invasion. Some have been translated but as Stephen Hayes has indicated are being closely held by the administration. To what end? Only Bush and his close circle know.
40 posted on
01/28/2006 7:53:13 PM PST by
gov_bean_ counter
(It is easy to call for a pi$$ing contest when you aren't going to be in the line of fire.)
To: xzins
They could ignore Sada because Sada could be wrong, whether intentionally or unintentionally. He could be intentionally wrong, but as former Deputy Chief of the Iraqi Air Force, he's unlikely to unintentionally wrong, at least about the air transfers.
66 posted on
01/28/2006 11:34:07 PM PST by
El Gato
(The Second Amendment is the Reset Button of the U.S. Constitution)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson