Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bloggers prefer Shadegg or Boehner over Blunt for House Leader
The Hill Magazine ^ | January 25, 2005 | Alexander Bolton

Posted on 01/28/2006 6:49:05 PM PST by new yorker 77

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-35 last
To: Txsleuth

Yeah, Pence would have made a great Majority Leader. I just hope the secret ballot will let our Congressman switch to vote for Shadegg.


21 posted on 01/28/2006 7:51:54 PM PST by MassachusettsGOP (Massachusetts Republican....A rare breed indeed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: new yorker 77

I want Shadegg, heard Hannity interview with Boehner and Shadegg. Shadegg seems like he wants to push a conservative agenda, Boehner was in the leadership before but . Blunt wouldn't even show up for the interview.

Dissing Sean Hannity to not engage with your opponents, also the earmarks and out of control spending, Abramoff money.


22 posted on 01/28/2006 7:52:27 PM PST by TheEaglehasLanded
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: McGavin999

That is great to know....He sounds like a "down home" guy...which this Texan appreciates...


23 posted on 01/28/2006 7:57:34 PM PST by Txsleuth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: MassachusettsGOP

Oh...yeah...I hadn't thought about that...

I guess those that have "come out" for one candidate or another aren't bound by that endorsement.


24 posted on 01/28/2006 7:58:47 PM PST by Txsleuth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Txsleuth

Mike Pence himself decided not to run for majority leader but he endorses Shadegg for Majority Leader.


25 posted on 01/28/2006 8:11:13 PM PST by old republic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: old republic

Yes....I know...but he was pressured NOT to run, I think.

I am glad he is backing Shadegg...and I think his time will come, though, don't you??

I have also read that there are rumblings of making a sweep of the leaders of all of the different committees...to "start over" so to speak...with new faces to take the cries of corruption away..

So...I would think that would leave open the possibility that Pence could chair one of the more important committees...


26 posted on 01/28/2006 8:16:48 PM PST by Txsleuth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: new yorker 77

Shadegg BUMP!! He's the man.


27 posted on 01/28/2006 8:19:23 PM PST by upchuck (Article posts of just one or two sentences do not preserve the quality of FR. Lazy FReepers be gone!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Txsleuth

Most of the good guys in Congress are shut up. I hope they shake up the committees. They need to put real conservatives in charge. They especially need to make a real conservative the chairman of the Rules Committee.


28 posted on 01/28/2006 8:55:03 PM PST by old republic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

I favor Rogers.


29 posted on 01/28/2006 10:44:38 PM PST by JohnnyZ (Happy New Year! Breed like dogs!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: new yorker 77

You must be crazy if you think that Boehner is a conservative. If Boehner gets it, kiss the conservative agenda good bye.

Krempasky was completely incorrect about what Blunt had to say on the teleconference. I listened to it. He is simply mad because Blunt ended the questioning before Krempasky had a chance to unload on him. In my view, Red State has been doing a very, very poor job of covering this race.

Now, that said, I would agree that Blunt is not doing a good job of communicating with the new media. My guess is that his media advisors are probably telling him to run his campaign like Bush did in many ways.. like not responding to things that Boehner is saying etc.. But in all honesty he really needs to engage new media.

I will tell you that I am from Roy's district and while I do not agree with everything he has done - I know he is a conservative. the 94 rating is with him being in leadership and helping pass much of the president's agenda.

If we want to change things radicially - I would look at replacing Hassert. If you guys remember - Drier was supposed to be the acting majority leader, not Blunt.

If Blunt does not win, I hope its Shadegg. Boehner is doing this as a power grab plain and simple. He is not a dedicated conservative.

I am glad that Shadegg joined the race because it helps drive the discussion and tries to hit home our agenda.


30 posted on 01/28/2006 11:18:29 PM PST by BoBToMatoE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: new yorker 77

How about a real conservative republican, one that wants smaller govt. NOT larger. One that doesn't want to take and spend my money. One that doesn't want any damn govt in every aspect of our lives.


31 posted on 01/29/2006 2:56:48 AM PST by Joe Boucher (an enemy of islam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: new yorker 77

I sure hope they pick someone telegenic and articulate. The republicans seem to have the most untelegenic and inarticulate spokespeople that have ever existed.


32 posted on 01/29/2006 4:12:17 AM PST by tkathy (Ban the headscarf (http://bloodlesslinchpinsofislamicterrorism.blogspot.com))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: new yorker 77; Clintonfatigued

"Bloggers on both ends of the political spectrum have demonstrated an ability to have significant political impact in recent years."

Gee. Do you think that has ANYTHING to do with the fact that they're getting the real skinny directly from THE VOTERS, versus slanted/packed/stacked/crooked polling data?

You know, people DO show their true colors when they're voicing their opinions amongst their friends. Why our Congress doesn't LISTEN to us in the first place is our own fault because we're obviously electing people that don't listen to us.

(She railed, as she fruitlessly e-mailed her two (D) Senators and one (D) CongressLesbian from Wisconsin on her advice as to who to select for the open House Speaker position, LOL!)


33 posted on 01/29/2006 5:51:10 AM PST by Diana in Wisconsin (Save The Earth. It's The Only Planet With Chocolate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BoBToMatoE

"If we want to change things radicially - I would look at replacing Hassert."

I think that Hastert will be retiring either in 2008 or 2010.


34 posted on 01/29/2006 9:30:19 AM PST by Clintonfatigued (Sam Alito Deserves To Be Confirmed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Diana in Wisconsin

Whose your congress lesbian?


35 posted on 02/01/2006 11:07:31 PM PST by SDGOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-35 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson